Bug 475359
| Summary: | %files directive doesn't support multiple -f options | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sylvain Beucler <beuc> |
| Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Jindrich Novy <jnovy> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 11 | CC: | ffesti, jnovy, n3npq, pknirsch, pmatilai |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 4.7.1-1.fc11 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-06-18 11:25:59 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
While multiple -f options might be useful (to you), there is
nothing stopping you from merging the manifests generated
at the end of %install. E.g. the snippet
cat %{name}.lang %{name}-gnulib.lang > mergedmanifest
...
%files -f mergedmanifest
accomplishes your goal without having to wait for an implementation to
appear in rpm. Even if the implementation existed Right Now, it would
be years before multiple %file -f manifests were widely/reliably deployed.
As I mentioned, I know about this work-around. I'm currently using it since there's no choice indeed right now. The point, however, is that it would be quite nice to fix it, either by printing an error, or actually supporting multiple '-f' option. The absence of either one made me waste time figure out what was wrong. I'm aware that the implementation will take one Fedora release or two to reach the autobuilders, but hopefully this won't prevent fixes from being made :) This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle. Changing version to '11'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping This is now tracked upstream: http://rpm.org/ticket/70 rpm-4.7.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpm-4.7.1-1.fc11 rpm-4.7.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |
Description of problem: I'd like to specify several '-f' options to %files in a spec file. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ rpmbuild --version RPM version 4.4.2.3 How reproducible: %install %find_lang %{name} %find_lang %{name}-gnulib [...] %files engine -f %{name}.lang -f %{name}-gnulib.lang Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create a .spec file as shown hereinbefore 2. rpmbuild -ba ./test.spec Actual results: The last '-f' option is used, the first one is ignored. As a result the specfile missed installed files: Erreur de construction de RPM: Fichier(s) installé(s) (mais non empaquetés): /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/freedink.mo /usr/share/locale/en@boldquot/LC_MESSAGES/freedink.mo /usr/share/locale/en@quot/LC_MESSAGES/freedink.mo /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/freedink.mo Expected results: Both files would be be taken into account. Or to the least, I would get an error stating that this isn't supported, to avoid spending time playing around with the syntax to no avail. Additional info: The work-around is pretty ugly: # %files only support one '-f' argument (see below) cat %{name}-gnulib.lang >> %{name}.lang It sounds more intuitive to accept multiple '-f' options directly. I asked around at #fedora-devel and the answer was either to like the work-around or file a bug - so I guess this truly is something to fix :)