Bug 475442
Summary: | spurious dependency on esound-devel | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Bernie Innocenti <bernie+fedora> |
Component: | libgnome | Assignee: | Ray Strode [halfline] <rstrode> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 10 | CC: | alex, bnocera, kevin, mclasen, mike, rstrode |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened, Triaged |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-12-18 07:13:26 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Bernie Innocenti
2008-12-09 08:49:07 UTC
should be fixed now. thanks. Will this be pushed to F-10 too? would you like it to be? I can. Would be great :) libgnome-2.24.1-9.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgnome-2.24.1-9.fc10 yay! esound must die die die die! :-) Closed? $ sudo rpm -e esound-devel error: Failed dependencies: esound-devel is needed by (installed) libgnome-devel-2.24.1-8.fc10.x86_64 Sorry, excuse my bad comment... I had -8 instead of -9. Reopening. This is breaking applications in the stable release. I don't see a problem leaving it as-is for rawhide, but it needs to be re-enabled for F10 itself. Why was this pushed out to stable despite the objections voiced in comment #9 and on the mailing list? (In reply to comment #10) > Why was this pushed out to stable despite the objections voiced in comment #9 > and on the mailing list? There was no karma given in over two months (this bug was prior to me being in QA), although if it was announced on the mailing list prior to being pushed to stable then that is a problem, however, I cannot find a note of this issue in fedora-devel-list. I think this is fixed in F-11/rawhide now and rolled back in F-10. Any need to be open still? (In reply to comment #12) > I think this is fixed in F-11/rawhide now and rolled back in F-10. Any need to > be open still? If it's been rolled back for F-10, then it should be fine to close. It was not rolled back, libgnome-2.24.1-9.fc10 is the latest in dist-f10-updates. This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Fedora 10 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-12-17. Fedora 10 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |