Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Review Request: poi - Java API to Access Microsoft Format Files|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Sandro Mathys <red>|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||fedora-package-review, mtasaka, notting, sandro|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2009-03-13 10:54:53 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Sandro Mathys 2008-12-09 07:20:49 EST
Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi-3.2-0.1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The POI project is the master project for developing pure Java ports of file formats based on Microsoft's OLE 2 Compound Document Format. OLE 2 Compound Document Format is used by Microsoft Office Documents, as well as by programs using MFC property sets to serialize their document objects. rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or errors. I'd still need a sponsor.
Comment 1 Sandro Mathys 2008-12-11 20:04:47 EST
mock-(re)build failed due to some junit problem. I'll need some time to look into this.
Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2008-12-15 10:07:04 EST
Comment 3 Sandro Mathys 2008-12-15 23:31:47 EST
Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi-3.2-1.fc10.src.rpm New version including much of the experience I got when my jcalendar pkg was reviewed.
Comment 4 Sandro Mathys 2008-12-18 17:02:55 EST
Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poi-3.2-2.fc11.src.rpm Rebuilt on rawhide. Now using build-jar-repository.
Comment 5 Mamoru TASAKA 2008-12-22 12:46:53 EST
* License issue Almost all files are under ASL 2.0, however - The following file is under GPLv3 src/resources/scratchpad/org/apache/poi/hdgf/chunks_parse_cmds.tbl Would you check how this file is used? - The following files have some questionable (?) license terms: src/documentation/content/xdocs/entity/* Would you check how these files are used? * Preshipped binaries - The source zip file contains many preshipped binary files such as .xlsx files. Would you remove these files? * koji build - By the way rebuild failed on dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1016360
Comment 6 Mamoru TASAKA 2009-01-17 11:59:55 EST
Would you update the status of this bug?
Comment 7 Mamoru TASAKA 2009-01-30 10:09:31 EST
Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2009-03-09 12:55:34 EDT
I will close this bug if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK.
Comment 9 Sandro Mathys 2009-03-13 03:44:03 EDT
I apologize, I'm really short in time lately and this will probably not change until the second half of the year. (new job, searching a flat, moving in, a.s.o.) Therefore, there's no update to this bug, I'm sorry. I know, that it's not a big thing to check with upstream about the licenses and the preshipped binaries (or to answer to this bug earlier) - but unfortunately, several little things add up to a big (i.e. time-consuming) pretty fast. Anyone's welcome to help here or take this over if they wish to.
Comment 10 Mamoru TASAKA 2009-03-13 10:54:53 EDT
Okay, thank you for the reply anyway. Now I once close this bug so that someone else can pick up this review request. If you have some time again to work with this package, please feel free to open a new review request for this package.