Bug 475969

Summary:	difference between the name of the binary and the name in its usage message
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Milos Malik <mmalik>
Component:	ecryptfs-utils	Assignee:	Michal Hlavinka <mhlavink>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	BaseOS QE <qe-baseos-auto>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	5.3	CC:	mnowak, rvokal
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-09-02 09:57:05 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Milos Malik 2008-12-11 11:33:16 UTC

Description of problem:
Some utilities (when executed without parameters) print the usage message which contains a different name than the name of the binary. The difference is '_' versus '-'.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ecryptfs-utils-56-8.el5

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
Run any of the following utilities and the '_' vs. '-' problem will appear.
1. /usr/bin/ecryptfs-wrap-passphrase
2. /usr/bin/ecryptfs-unwrap-passphrase
3. /usr/bin/ecryptfs-rewrap-passphrase
4. /usr/bin/ecryptfs-insert-wrapped-passphrase-into-keyring
  
Actual results:
The name of the binary and the name in the usage message is different.

Expected results:
The name of the binary and the name in the usage message is the same.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Michal Hlavinka 2009-02-02 15:43:59 UTC

this is fixed since version 63
it will be fixed by rebase (#482834) or patch backported from this commit http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mhalcrow/ecryptfs-utils.git;a=commit;h=49044f8d8e870d91deecf1fa2d1a2ff97f278056

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2009-09-02 09:57:05 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1307.html