Bug 476310
Summary: | Review Request: pyifp - Python Bindings for libifp | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Conrad Meyer <cse.cem+redhatbugz> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jason Tibbitts <j> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | j:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-03-18 06:02:13 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 476313 |
Description
Conrad Meyer
2008-12-12 23:36:40 UTC
Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=995912 This one builds cleanly and rpmlint is quiet. Not sure why I'm the first person to look at it. Could the %description perhaps grow some description of what "iFP" is? It's not a big deal, but it would have been nice to not have had to look it up. I haven't the hardware to test this, but nobody else with hardware has shown up to review it, so.... * source files match upstream. sha256sum: df283d037ee206ede1de7e058022a7cd13d55c4d935323c3ae3af923b39f8ff3 pyifp-0.2.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. X description could use a bit of elucidation. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: _ifp_core.so()(64bit) _usb_core.so()(64bit) pyifp = 0.2.2-1.fc11 pyifp(x86-64) = 0.2.2-1.fc11 = /usr/bin/python libifp.so.4()(64bit) libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) libusb-0.1.so.4()(64bit) python(abi) = 2.6 * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED Thanks! I added more to the description locally. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pyifp Short Description: Python Bindings for libifp Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 InitialCC: cvs done. Built in koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1247320 |