Bug 47642
Summary: | Put sendmail + apache into initial skip-list | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Enrico Scholz <rh-bugzilla> |
Component: | up2date | Assignee: | Adrian Likins <alikins> |
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Jay Turner <jturner> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.3 | CC: | srevivo |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2001-07-06 18:29:47 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Enrico Scholz
2001-07-06 11:20:54 UTC
We are looking at the packages which should be included by default in the package listing, but in the meantime, you can always run 'up2date --config' and add sendmail, apache and any other packages that you would like to the exclusion list. I have no problem with `up2date' because I don't run auto-update on production-machines. But other people who are doing it will run into trouble. When they get the first time a misconfigured system by up2date and phone calls from their boss, they will probably call 'up2date --config' or change the distribution. To prevent such nasty incidents, at least the named packages should be in an initial skip-list of 'up2date'. The up2date behaviour is designed to mimic default rpm handling of config files, with the exception of the case: oldpackage has %config file with default md5sum of valueA newpackage has %config file with default md5sum of valueB The version of the config file ondisk has md5sum of valueC in which case up2date will refuse to update the package by default, since the config has been modified, but, since the md5sum of the default config file in the new package changed, we have to assume the config file format changed and the old modified ondisk file may not be valid with the update. In other words, up2date doesnt know which version to use, and punts. In this case, bug #29367 seems to indicate a packageing problem in the sendmail rpm (at least, according to the reports), but the behaviour of #30302 seems to be acting correctly. It appears that the default version of the config files changed, so they were updated by rpm to the new versions. If the config files were modified, the new ones should get installed as .rpmnew. Investigating further... |