Bug 476718
Summary: | Change for yum-updatesd shipped with yum, to avoid use of bare send_interface dbus policy rules | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Colin Walters <walters> | ||||
Component: | yum-updatesd | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | low | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | ffesti, james.antill, katzj, pmatilai, tim.lauridsen | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2009-01-15 23:17:53 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Colin Walters
2008-12-16 18:43:06 UTC
So do these lines do nothing anyway? B/c I'm a little fuzzy on how that patch fixes things. They something, but more than we want (detailed in the bug report). Removing them is safe because they are redundant with the send_destination rule. (Yes, the policy language is confusing as hell and basically busted; I'm just trying to get everything on a common sane base and then am considering doing a new config format) s/They something/They do do something/ Not sure how much we care about this, given no sane person should be using that version of yum-updatesd ... Colin do we want another BZ for the real yum-updatesd? The real one? Oh, I see it's in a different package. I'll just move this one. Fixed upstream |