Bug 479275

Summary:	issues in Satellite 5.2 Installation Guide PDF
Product:	Red Hat Satellite 5	Reporter:	Jan Hutař <jhutar>
Component:	Docs Installation Guide	Assignee:	John Ha <jha>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Jan Hutař <jhutar>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	520	CC:	adstrong, bperkins, jpazdziora
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Documentation
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	sat530	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-09-10 20:45:13 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	456984

Description Jan Hutař 2009-01-08 15:48:34 UTC

Description of problem:
Just a few small issues I have noted when reading through Satellite 5.2 Installation Guide PDF:
 * only up2date is mentioned in the guide, but we do now ship it for RHEL-5
   as well, so yum should be there too
 * Table 6.1. RHN Satellite Exporter Options
   - '--traceback-email' should be '--traceback-email=EMAIL'
 * Table 6.2. Satellite Import/Sync Options
   - '--systemid' twice in the table
 * Table 8.1. RHN DB Control Options
   - `service rhn-database status` works as well


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Red Hat Network Satellite 5.2
Installation Guide
Revision 1.0

Comment 1 Brandon Perkins 2009-01-08 16:21:26 UTC

We typically don't do docs updates for maintenance releases (except for release notes), so going to realign this to 5.3 docs.

Comment 2 John Ha 2009-02-28 09:13:33 UTC

All of these issues have been fixed (including adding yum alongside up2date when necessary).

http://documentation-stage.bne.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Network_Satellite/5.3.0/html/Installation_Guide/

Comment 3 Jan Hutař 2009-03-02 13:04:09 UTC

Hello,

#2 '=EMAIL' is missing

#3 '--systemid' still twice

Thanks, Jan

Comment 4 John Ha 2009-03-02 19:25:52 UTC

Okay, fixed built in now. Thanks again for your help.

http://documentation-stage.bne.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Network_Satellite/5.3.0/html/Installation_Guide/s1-sat-sync-tool.html

Comment 5 Jan Hutař 2009-03-03 09:48:34 UTC

Great, thank you.

Comment 6 Jan Pazdziora 2009-08-19 14:57:24 UTC

https://xen5.englab.brq.redhat.com/rhn/help/satellite/en-US/s1-maintenance-update.jsp mentions yum update.

https://xen5.englab.brq.redhat.com/rhn/help/satellite/en-US/ch-import-sync.jsp#s2-satellite-exporter has --traceback-mail=EMAIL.

There's only one line in https://xen5.englab.brq.redhat.com/rhn/help/satellite/en-US/s1-sat-sync-tool.jsp#s2-import-rhnsst talking about --systemid=SYSTEM_ID.

There's no mention of service rhn-database status on https://xen5.englab.brq.redhat.com/rhn/help/satellite/en-US/s1-use-db-control.jsp#s2-rhn-db-control-options.

Jan, where should that service rhn-database status be?

Comment 7 Jan Hutař 2009-08-24 07:45:08 UTC

Hello,
I can see it on 20090820.0 in the table on page:

https://pipa02.englab.brq.redhat.com/rhn/help/satellite/en-US/s1-use-db-control.jsp

So this bug can be switched to RELEASE_PENDING.

Regards,
Jan

Comment 8 Jan Pazdziora 2009-08-24 08:22:30 UTC

Well,

https://pipa02.englab.brq.redhat.com/rhn/help/satellite/en-US/s1-use-db-control.jsp

shows status as a possible command to db-control. But there is no "service rhn-database status" there.

Well, now I'm actually trying it, there is no rhn-database service at all.

So ... I'm going to mark this RELEASE_PENDING even with that "service rhn-database status" missing, and file new bugzilla to get all occurrences of rhn-database removed.

Comment 9 Brandon Perkins 2009-09-10 20:45:13 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2009-1434.html