Bug 479763

Summary: Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract Machine
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Fabian Affolter <mail>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, notting
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-11-14 09:54:04 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Fabian Affolter 2009-01-12 17:04:43 EST
Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/seam.spec
SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/seam-1.4-1.fc9.src.rpm

Project URL: http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/seam/

SEAM (Simple Extensible Abstract Machine) is a virtual machine
architecture and library. SEAM is designed to be language- and
platform-independent, to be simple and based on few principled

* Uniform data representation and memory management
* Platform-independent external representation
* Abstract execution model

Koji scratch build:

rpmlint output:
[fab@laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint seam*
seam.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libseam.so.0.0.0 exit@GLIBC_2.0
seam-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

[fab@laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint seam-1.4-1.fc9.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

At the moment this package is not building in 64-bit environments. ->  ExclusiveArch:  %{ix86} ppc

I guess it's around the GNU Lightning support.
Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 03:30:01 EDT
It's getting less and less useful to have an i386-only package; I don't even try building anything on i386 these days.  Is there no chance of getting this to work on x86_64 or any other 64-bit architecture?
Comment 2 Fabian Affolter 2009-08-03 09:39:08 EDT
I will take a new look.
Comment 3 Fabian Affolter 2009-11-14 09:54:04 EST
Upstream doesn't seam to be active any more.