Bug 480312
| Summary: | libssh2 needs libssl.so.7, which is not available. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Horst H. von Brand <vonbrand> |
| Component: | openssl | Assignee: | Chris Weyl <cweyl> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | antoalbe, antoine.gaillard13, bugzilla, cweyl, djuran, johannbg, mcepl, michal, tmraz |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | libssh2 needs libssl.so.7, which is not available. | ||
| Fixed In Version: | openssl-0.9.8j-5.fc11 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-01-19 07:18:38 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Horst H. von Brand
2009-01-16 12:25:16 UTC
Actually libssl.so.7 is available in rawhide (openssl-0.9.8g-12.fc10) and libssh2 does depend on this package... What exact action is it that you are trying that fails? Really a bug in openssl-0.9.8j-1.fc11.x86_64 (or perhaps in how yum handles updates).
Digging around, I found out that /lib64/lib{ssl,crypto}.so.7 were broken symlinks to lib{ssl,crypto}.so.0.9.8g (from the previous openssl). Fixing them up by hand got things working fine.
*** Bug 480310 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 480348 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** openssl-0.9.8j-3.fc11.x86_64 which will be in the next rawhide push should hopefully fix this. *** Bug 480386 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** > openssl-0.9.8j-3.fc11.x86_64 which will be in the next rawhide push should
> hopefully fix this.
I just run an update from openssl-0.9.8g-12.fc10.x86_64 to openssl-0.9.8j-3.fc11.x86_64 and something _ate_ /lib64/libssl.so.7 and
/lib64/libcrypto.so.7 links. Forcing a reinstallation of 0.9.8j-3.fc11 runs postinstall scripts and links do show up and besided they belong to that package as well.
I would suspect a cleanup phase in yum but, at least apperently, these links should not be touched. OTOH before an update they are links to libssl.so.0.9.8g and libcrypto.so.0.9.8g respectively so maybe on an installation of a new package they are left alone and later removed as they are wrong links? That does not sound right as postinstall is using "ln -sf ..." but maybe?
Unfortunately backing off openssl updates with "--nodeps" breaks python, and hence yum, and running an update with "just rpm" works fine - as expected. If the theory above is right then maybe a removal of libssl.so.7 and libcrypto.so.7 in a preinstall script would help? That should be "survivable" until the package installation will create new ones. I am puzzled.
Here I have the correct links (after fixing the links by hand for openssl-0.9.8j-1.fc11.x86_64, and then updating, now at openssl-0.9.8j-5.fc11.x86_64). The links for i386 are right (I didn't fix those up by hand before). The 0.9.8j-5.fc11 tries to reinstate the symlinks in a triggerpostun. I've tried updating directly from 0.9.8g to 0.9.8j-5.fc11 and the links are OK, so I think it is fixed now. I have the same issue I'm running FC11 i686 and I have the same missing dependencies while trying to install ffmpeg. I tried to make the symlinks manually but it doesn't work. ffmpeg is not part of Fedora repositories. The maintainers of packages in other repositories (rpmfusion and so on) have to rebuild the dependent packages themselves. |