Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Root-NFS: Server returned error -5 while mounting|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Marcel Ziswiler <marcel>|
|Component:||nfs-utils||Assignee:||Steve Dickson <steved>|
|Status:||CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2009-06-16 20:45:27 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Marcel Ziswiler 2009-01-23 20:21:05 EST
Description of problem: I noticed recent update of nfs-utils 1.1.4-6.fc10 to fail NFS mounting its root file system on my embedded Linux target from my Fedora 10 NFS server. Downgrading to nfs-utils 1.1.4-1.fc10 made it work again. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): nfs-utils-1.1.4-6.fc10.x86_64.rpm How reproducible: Existing running NFS setup to boot embedded Linux target. Upgrading nfs-utils makes it fail. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Existing running NFS setup to boot embedded Linux target 2. Upgrade nfs-utils from 1.1.4-1.fc10 to 1.1.4-6.fc10 3. Mounting root file system on embedded target now fails Actual results: Root-NFS: Server returned error -5 while mounting Expected results: VFS: Mounted root (nfs filesystem). Additional info: I of course did try to re-install nfs-utils-1.1.4-6.fc10 after having it gotten to work again by downgrading to nfs-utils-1.1.4-1.fc10 which immediately made it brake again. So there is absolutely no doubt in nfs-utils-1.1.4-6.fc10 introducing the issue! I attached wireshark traces of good (e.g. nfs-utils-1.1.4-1.fc10) vs. bad (e.g. nfs-utils-1.1.4-6.fc10) case.
Comment 1 Marcel Ziswiler 2009-01-23 20:23:17 EST
Created attachment 329893 [details] wireshark traces of good (e.g. nfs-utils-1.1.4-1.fc10) vs. bad (e.g. nfs-utils-1.1.4-6.fc10) case
Comment 2 Marcel Ziswiler 2009-01-25 16:27:13 EST
Unfortunately nfs-utils-1.1.4-7.fc10.x86_64 still shows bad behaviour.
Comment 3 Steve Dickson 2009-03-05 06:42:11 EST
There is absolutely no difference (that I can see) between the mount in the 'nfs-good' trace and the 'nfs-bad' trace.... What do the exports look like?
Comment 4 Steve Dickson 2009-06-11 10:54:50 EDT
Is there still happening with the nfs-utils-1.1.5 release?
Comment 5 Marcel Ziswiler 2009-06-16 17:06:49 EDT
Nope, it works fine again. Will soon try how it goes in F11.
Comment 6 Steve Dickson 2009-06-16 20:45:27 EDT
Ok... I'm going to close this bug...