Bug 484272

Description of problem:
When I try installing tex-musixtex-doc with smart package manager, it complains that no package provides tex-musixtex-0.114-3.fc9, even though the package that seems to match that description is right there next to it (in alphabetical order).
I scanned the XML metadata for the updates-9-i386 repository, and found that while tex-musixtex has an rpm:provides 'rpm:entry name="tex-musixtex" flags="EQ" epoch="0" ver="0.114" rel="3.fc9"/' (imagine angle brackets instead of single quotes), tex-musixtex-doc rpm:requires 'rpm:entry name="tex-musixtex=0.114-3.fc9"/'.  I'm not intimately familiar with the repo metadata format, but perhaps this difference of treating it all as one long name, vs. breaking it up into components, causes smart to consider the require unfulfilled.
...checked with `yum install` instead of smart, and it's affected by this, too.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
tex-musixtex(-doc)-0.114-3.fc9

How reproducible:
Attempt to install tex-musixtex-doc while tex-musixtex is available (for a package manager that will handle dependencies) or already installed.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. (smart|yum) install tex-musixtex-doc
  
Actual results:
tex-musixtex-doc-0.114-3.fc9.noarch from updates-newkey has depsolving problems
  --> Missing Dependency: tex-musixtex=0.114-3.fc9 is needed by package tex-musixtex-doc-0.114-3.fc9.noarch (updates-newkey)
Error: Missing Dependency: tex-musixtex=0.114-3.fc9 is needed by package tex-musixtex-doc-0.114-3.fc9.noarch (updates-newkey)

Expected results:
tex-musixtex-doc installed

Additional info:
This might well not be a problem with tex-musixtex at all, but rather whichever form of createrepo and the like is used in the fedoraproject.org repositories.  Could be the smart package manager on my end, too.  But I thought I'd start small, with the package directly affected.