Bug 484837

Summary: xchat.prov no effect on 64 bits arch
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka>
Component: xchatAssignee: Kevin Kofler <kevin>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: caillon, fedora, kevin
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 2.8.6-6.fc11 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-02-10 09:27:14 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Mamoru TASAKA 2009-02-10 08:29:12 UTC 
Description of problem:
See:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=950009

There is :
Provides  	
perl.so()(64bit)
python.so()(64bit)

These Provides cannot be filtered out by
-------------------------------------
        | %{__sed} '/\.so$/d'
-------------------------------------


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
xchat-1:2.8.6-5.fc11.x86_64

How reproducible:
100%
Comment 1 Kevin Kofler 2009-02-10 08:42:37 UTC 
Oops, %{__sed} '/\.so$/d' needs to be: %{__sed} '/\.so\(()(64bit)\)\?$/d'
Fixing.
Comment 2 Kevin Kofler 2009-02-10 08:56:45 UTC 
Fixed and confirmed fixed (checked the Provides in the Koji rpminfo) in Rawhide. I don't think this is worth pushing updates for, so closing as RAWHIDE.
Comment 3 Mamoru TASAKA 2009-02-10 09:03:14 UTC 
The latest method is not correct on i386.
Comment 4 Kevin Kofler 2009-02-10 09:27:14 UTC 
It is correct.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=997056
No bogus Provides.

\.so\(()(64bit)\)\?$ means either .so or .so()(64bit) at the end of the line.
Comment 5 Mamoru TASAKA 2009-02-10 09:42:43 UTC 
Oh, I missed the last question mark, thanks.