Bug 486208
Summary: | RFE: add 'listfiles' command to yum | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Tobias Mueller <fedora-bugs> |
Component: | yum | Assignee: | Seth Vidal <skvidal> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 10 | CC: | ffesti, iarlyy, james.antill, maxamillion, pmatilai, tim.lauridsen |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-06-26 19:20:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Tobias Mueller
2009-02-18 21:20:58 UTC
currently rpm -ql _package_name_ ( for example: rpm -ql ca-certicates ) does it. Adding FutureFeature to keywords. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers does futurefeature imply that we're going to do this? B/c I think it is unlikely this will ever wind its into yum itself. Sorry. I understood wrong. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers This has been discussed and there is no need to reinvent the wheel on this matter. Closing as WONTFIX. Hey Adam, could you point me to the discussion, please? Especially to the point where it has been decided that is isn't about making the users life as easy as possible. Thanks. What isn't about the users life as easy as possible? Adding lots and lots of options is not making life easier for the user. If you want to make this bug about needing better documentation about repoquery and rpm -q - that's fine. The discussion Adam mentioned was on irc. |