Bug 487105
| Summary: | launchpad scripts have insufficient permissions | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 | Reporter: | Radek Bíba <rbiba> | |
| Component: | java-1.6.0-ibm | Assignee: | Lillian Angel <langel> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE <qe-baseos-auto> | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | low | |||
| Version: | 4.7 | CC: | borgan, bugproxy, david_edwards, syeghiay | |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Reopened | |
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | All | |||
| OS: | Linux | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 528037 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-10-12 13:17:05 UTC | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 528037 | |||
|
Description
Radek Bíba
2009-02-24 09:18:38 UTC
hmm seems like this is a common problem. would you like a respin or to wait for the next update? Next update is fine. In fact, if the permissions could be fixed in the tarball, we wouldn't have to do any hacking in .spec. Can you bring this to IBM's attention? yes, i will direct them to this bz. Also, note that gtkhelper has the same permission issues: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10934 Nov 28 23:38 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-ibm-1.5.0.9.x86_64/jre/lib/gtkhelper Actually, I was wrong, the permissions are correct in the tarballs. Sorry. Looks like this line in the .spec file is too greedy (and likely not needed at all): find docs -type f | xargs chmod 644 As for /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-ibm-1.5.0.9.x86_64/jre/lib/gtkhelper, that's the 1.5.0 java, while launchpad (this bug report) is 1.6.0-only. BTW, it has 644 in the tarball. But then again, it's probably okay. These files should be removed because they are arch dependent. marking as a duplicate *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 487107 *** I don't think these files are arch dependent. They're just shell scripts. Please investigate. Reopening since the .sh files (scripts) are supposed to be executable. See comment 4 for an explanation why they aren't. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1492.html |