Bug 487241
Summary: | Review Request: ntlmaps - NTLM Authentication Proxy Service | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Matt Domsch <matt_domsch> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dan, fedora, fedora-package-review, notting, rebus, sanne.grinovero, tiagomatos |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-08-18 14:44:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Matt Domsch
2009-02-24 22:34:34 UTC
few notes before a formal review: - you can drop the version specification in BR: python-devel, we have 2.x for a long time - as it is supposed to be run as a service it should have an init script and an own user - the dos2unix conversion is better done in %prep (In reply to comment #0) > intend to tag it as version 1.0 quite soon, pending any major bugs found over > the next few days. Hello Matt, please do you still intend to issue version 1.0 of ntlmaps? Best regards Michal Ambroz Hi Matt, are you not maintainig this any more? This package is very useful; Big enterprises often require this kind of authorization and I would be totally stuck in a windows vm without it. Please have it integrated in Fedora's repositories; Ubuntu is having it, and provides the required init scripts. thanks Sanne I'm now running cntlm instead of ntlmaps where I need to. I've only been running it for a few days, but it seems to be working well, and as expected. ntlmaps has been getting threads stuck polling, taking up 100% CPU time, quite frequently. As such, I would like to close this request, and open a new request to get cntlm included in Fedora instead. Thanks for posting that link, Matt. You are right, NTLMAPS can be quite unreliable and a resource hog - but it was better than nothing! I have tested cntlm too and so far it seems to work *much* more reliably. They provide a 32bit RPM which worked just fine on my 64bit Fedora 13 install. I agree with Matt, and vote for cntlm over ntlmaps. However, I wonder whether there might be patent / licensing issues for Red Hat to include this - which is why it never has been before? -c See the cntlm package review ticket. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626862 |