Bug 487754

Summary:	Bump Requires: rhnlib >= 2.1 to 2.2.7 in support of enhance and test redirect support for rhnlib
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Brandon Perkins <bperkins>
Component:	rhn-client-tools	Assignee:	Pradeep Kilambi <pkilambi>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	5.4	CC:	jturner, syeghiay
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-09-02 11:21:55 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	484245
Bug Blocks:	490077

Description Brandon Perkins 2009-02-27 18:49:43 UTC

Description of problem:
Bump Requires: rhnlib >= 2.1 to 2.2.7 in support of enhance and test redirect support for rhnlib

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.4.19-17

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install rhn-client-tools
2. $ rpm -q --requires rhn-client-tools | grep rhnlib
3. $ rpm -q rhnlib
  
Actual results:
# rpm -q --requires rhn-client-tools | grep rhnlib && rpm -q rhnlib
rhnlib >= 2.1
rhnlib-2.2.6-2.el5


Expected results:
rhnlib >= 2.2.7
rhnlib-2.2.7-##.el5

Additional info:

Comment 4 Jay Turner 2009-06-25 01:50:30 UTC

$ rpm -qpR rhn-client-tools-0.4.20-7.el5.noarch.rpm 
[snip]
rhnlib >= 2.2.7
[snip]

Also note that 0.4.20-7.el5 is included in the RHEL5.4-Client-20090623.0 tree.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2009-09-02 11:21:55 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1354.html