Bug 488594

Summary: dkim-milter: DNS public key DoS
Product: [Other] Security Response Reporter: Vincent Danen <vdanen>
Component: vulnerabilityAssignee: Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: unspecifiedCC: radford
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-03-22 01:13:32 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 488595    
Bug Blocks:    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Upstream patch to fix the issue none

Description Vincent Danen 2009-03-04 21:16:42 UTC
dkim-milter does not properly handle verification of messages signed with a key that has been revoked in DNS (the p= flag set to an empty string).

References:

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/03/01/1
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2508602&group_id=139420&atid=744358
http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1728

A CVE has been requested, but not assigned yet.

This has been fixed upstream in 2.8.1, which is shipped in F10, but F9 has 2.5.1 which would be vulnerable to this issue.

Comment 1 Vincent Danen 2009-03-04 21:16:57 UTC
Created dkim-milter tracking bugs for this issue

Affects: F9 [bug #488595]

Comment 2 Vincent Danen 2009-03-04 21:17:36 UTC
Created attachment 334070 [details]
Upstream patch to fix the issue

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2009-03-04 23:27:23 UTC
dkim-milter-2.8.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dkim-milter-2.8.1-1.fc9

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2009-03-05 16:26:53 UTC
dkim-milter-2.8.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.