Bug 488938 (filezilla_fail_run)
Summary: | Missing libtinyxml.so.0 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Luya Tshimbalanga <luya> |
Component: | filezilla | Assignee: | Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 10 | CC: | kwizart |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-03-06 10:43:59 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Luya Tshimbalanga
2009-03-06 10:30:23 UTC
Unless the package installation have been forced, the library requirement is a very stong rpm dependency. This should have failed at install time, if repository had a temporary problem to find the tinyxml package. Usually rpm -qR filezilla will output: ... libtinyxml.so.0() ... which is present in the $(rpm -ql tinyxml) package If you do rpm -e fillezilla yum install filezilla it should have fetched the tinyxml package. There is no bug within the filezilla package itself. (In reply to comment #1) > Unless the package installation have been forced, the library requirement is a > very stong rpm dependency. This should have failed at install time, if > repository had a temporary problem to find the tinyxml package. Which is odd as I have chosen Filezilla from installation and somehow missed that dependency after a few update. You suggestion worked though. |