Bug 489526
Summary: | Cannot import (new) gpg keys | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Carl Roth <roth> |
Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Panu Matilainen <pmatilai> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 10 | CC: | ffesti, jnovy, pmatilai, rpm |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-03-11 15:42:01 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Carl Roth
2009-03-10 15:51:40 UTC
Wierd, other packages in the same update do not have this problem. Nash, for instance, updated without a problem: [root@huggy packages]# rpm -qi nash Name : nash Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 6.0.71 Vendor: Fedora Project Release : 4.fc10 Build Date: Thu 12 Feb 2009 02:45:04 AM PST Install Date: Tue 10 Mar 2009 08:57:14 AM PDT Build Host: x86-5.fedora.phx.redhat.com Group : System Environment/Base Source RPM: mkinitrd-6.0.71-4.fc10.src.rpm Size : 287080 License: GPLv2+ Signature : DSA/SHA1, Mon 09 Mar 2009 03:31:09 AM PDT, Key ID bf226fcc4ebfc273 Packager : Fedora Project URL : git://git.fedoraproject.org/git/hosted/mkinitrd Summary : nash shell Description : nash shell used by initrd ... note that the same(ish) key is used. Hm, the nash RPM is tagged with a "DSA/SHA1" signature, but NetworkManager is tagged with a "DSA/8" signature. Sorry, I mis-read the initial rpm output. It does appear that the updates key is in my rpm keyring: D: added key gpg-pubkey-4ebfc273-48b5dbf3 to keyring D: read h# 1013 Header sanity check: OK Now we're left with the question of why the NetworkManager RPM is being disallowed by yum/rpm. The NetworkManager update in question was mis-signed as is being corrected: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-March/msg00643.html Rpm probably should report "bad signature" instead of "no key" in this case though... see also bug #489524 Just received the new NM package, thx. |