Bug 490106
Summary: | no ldapmail support compiled in | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Johannes Russek <johannes.russek> |
Component: | quota | Assignee: | Ondrej Vasik <ovasik> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 10 | CC: | kdudka, ovasik |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 3.16-7.fc10 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-03-13 12:20:22 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Johannes Russek
2009-03-13 09:54:01 UTC
So, after patching and recompiling the spec myself, i can add the following information: openldap and openssl are both needed (-devel for BuildRequire of course), also the openldap lib that comes with fedora will generate the following output: warnquota: LDAP library version >= 2.3 detected. Please use LDAP_URI instead of hostname and port. so the example in /etc/warnquota.conf would have to be adjusted accordingly. Thanks for report, however, it was not added in FC4 (actually I added --enable-ldapmail=try in F-9) - that bug report was just accidently closed with no change in spec file. You are right with the missing buildrequires, will fix that... Built in rawhide as quota-3.17-3.fc11 with openldap-devel (and temporarily openssl-devel - as openldap maintainer said nss patch review is in progress - in quota we tried to move from openssl to nss and now ldapmail support introduces openssl-devel dependency again ). Are you ok to close that bugzilla as RAWHIDE? (as I don't want to make F-10 update just to enable ldap support properly - it will of course be included in next bugfix F-10 update) Alright, that's fine with me. Removing LDAP_HOST and LDAP_PORT and using LDAP_URI in the example warnquota.conf would be nice too. Thx a bunch, Johannes Ok, closing RAWHIDE... At the moment in warnquota.conf example is: # If you have at least LDAP 2.3 installed, you can use LDAP_URI # LDAP_URI = ldaps://my.server:389 # Otherwise you can specify LDAP_HOST and LDAP_PORT # LDAP_HOST = ldap # LDAP_PORT = 389 Which seems ok to me (as someone could still have LDAP 2.2 - where you have to use LDAP_HOST and LDAP_PORT)- maybe s/you can/you should/ would be more appropriate. Will probably do that and propose one change to that example anyway - as "# LDAP_MAIL = false # or false if you don't want to use it" is very strange comment... quota-3.16-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |