Bug 490316
| Summary: | Port dbmail to gmime 2.4 API | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Alex Lancaster <alex> |
| Component: | dbmail | Assignee: | Bernard Johnson <bjohnson> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 15 | CC: | alex, bjohnson, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://dbmail.org/ | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-06-02 18:21:47 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 490397 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Alex Lancaster
2009-03-15 08:24:23 UTC
The initial indication from the dbmail development mailing list was the dbmail 2.3.x would build against gmime 2.4. This appears to not be the case. My query on the mailing list has gone unanswered when I pointed this out. As I see it, there are three options here: 1) Block dbmail from F-11. 2) Introduce a compat-gmime-2.2 package. 3) Port to gmime 2.4. #3 is not an option for me at this time. I suspect #2 would be the best at this point. What do you think? (In reply to comment #1) > The initial indication from the dbmail development mailing list was the dbmail > 2.3.x would build against gmime 2.4. This appears to not be the case. My > query on the mailing list has gone unanswered when I pointed this out. > > As I see it, there are three options here: > > 1) Block dbmail from F-11. > > 2) Introduce a compat-gmime-2.2 package. > > 3) Port to gmime 2.4. > > #3 is not an option for me at this time. I suspect #2 would be the best at > this point. What do you think? #2 might be best as there are other apps yet to be ported to gmime 2.4. Unfortunately the gmime maintainer didn't do a full inventory of what needed to be fixed. I think having at least one release (F-11) to allow apps to be ported before dropping the compat- package would be polite to application maintainers. Ok, I submitted a review for compat-gmime-2.2 (bz #490397). It's essentially the same as the last released gmime-2.2 series minus the mono parts and files versioned to eliminate conflicts. I did a test build of dbmail against the compat-devel-2.2 package and, as expected, it built fine. - gmime22 is built in rawhide - changes to dbmail have been committed to cvs and tagged Waiting for gmime22 to hit the buildsystems - if someone sees this before me, feel free to kick off the build. Rebuilt: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=94833 request for rel-eng tagging for f11-beta here: http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1407 Keep this bug open and retitling to be about porting dbmail to gmime 2.4.x This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle. Changing version to '11'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 13 development cycle. Changing version to '13'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 13. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '13'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 13's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 13 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping According to recent build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=2521338 it looks like this has been ported to use gmime 2.6, the following dep is shown: libgmime-2.6.so.0()(64bit) so closing bug as FIXED. |