Bug 490835

Summary: Review Request: oprofileui - OProfileUI is a user interface to the system profiler OProfile
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Guido Grazioli <guido.grazioli>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, notting, panemade
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-03-18 09:46:16 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Guido Grazioli 2009-03-18 09:33:08 UTC 
Spec URL: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/oprofileui/oprofileui.spec
SRPM URL: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/oprofileui/oprofileui-0.2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm
Description: 
OProfileUI is a user interface to the stochastic system profiler OProfile,
providing application developers and system integrators with a graphical view
of hotspots in their applications and systems.

This should be considered very low priority as there seems to be some breakage in oprofile 0.9.4 (which this package requires) and kernel module.
Comment 1 Parag AN(पराग) 2009-03-18 09:46:16 UTC 
unfortunately this package already exists in Fedora.
see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7615
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/oprofileui


You may like to check if package already exists at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ or in review at http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html

You can submit any other package of your interest but for now closing this as NOTABUG.
Comment 2 Parag AN(पराग) 2009-03-18 09:47:40 UTC 
I better mark this as DUPLICATE I guess of bug442233

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 442233 ***
Comment 3 Guido Grazioli 2009-03-18 09:54:57 UTC 
whoos, my bad...