Bug 490865
| Summary: | Review Request: perl-Date-Leapyear - Is a particular year a leap year? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Xavier Bachelot <xavier> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Ralf Corsepius <rc040203> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting, rc040203 |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | rc040203:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-03-27 02:03:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 490867 | ||
|
Description
Xavier Bachelot
2009-03-18 11:45:33 UTC
There is a license issue with this package (Artistic 1.0), but upstream has agreed to re-license to same terms as perl (GPL+ or Artistic). I've added the mail to the package in Source1 and pro-actively changed the license to get the review going. Please include the license related email in this package's /usr/share/doc/.../ APPROVED, provided you add the email. Thanks for the review Ralf. I've added the mail, as suggested. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Date-Leapyear Short Description: Is a particular year a leap year? Owners: xavierb Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig cvs done. Imported and built for F-9, F-10, EL-4 and EL-5. hmm, this should have been closed when the packages were pushed to stable... |