Bug 49153

Summary: Partition of FAT 32 will not write
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Jon <baceman007>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Brent Fox <bfox>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Brock Organ <borgan>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.1   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2001-07-20 22:17:08 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
printed linux install error none

Description Jon 2001-07-16 07:40:46 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98; Win 9x 4.90; 
MSOCD; AtHome020)

Description of problem:
Linux will not change the partition on my system because it has a fat 32 
partition with windows me on the disk as a primary dos partition and a fat 
32 extended dos partition which i am trying to write to.

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Go to partition section on RH 7.1 install.
2.Choose manual partitioning w/ disk druid.
3.Choose ext. dos partition and click edit to change, chance to /, then 
click next. 
	

Actual Results:  given error message and attached code.

Expected Results:  partition should have changed and RH should have loaded.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jon 2001-07-16 07:42:32 UTC
Created attachment 23687 [details]
printed linux install error

Comment 2 Brent Fox 2001-07-20 22:17:04 UTC
So you're trying to do a partitionless install, right?  This looks like a dupe
of bug #45686.  Partitionless installs work for me, and I have been unable to
reproduce this bug.  How much disk space do you have free on the FAT partition
that you wish to install to?  Also, how much swap space did you specify?  The
FAT partition already existed and was formatted, correct?

Comment 3 Brent Fox 2001-08-03 14:42:17 UTC
Closing due to inactivity.  Please reopen if you have more information.