Bug 492340

Summary: Unnecessary field requirement in UGC needs to be removed
Product: [Retired] JBoss Customer Support Portal Reporter: Tom Mirc <tmirc>
Component: User ProfileAssignee: JBoss CSP Bug Watch List <csp-bugs-watch>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 1.4   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-31 17:39:14 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Tom Mirc 2009-03-26 15:01:17 UTC
Description of problem:

Greeting (Mr/Mrs/Dr/Sr) is a required field for registering a new user through UGC.  A user may not always have the required data to meet this data requirement.  The required field validation on field "Greeting" needs to be removed. 

>> From: Matt Hicks <mhicks>
>> Date: March 19, 2009 12:04:49 PM EDT
>> To: Mike Amburn <mamburn>
>> Cc: Chris Alfonso <calfonso>
>> Subject: Re: UGC greeting requirement
>>
>> Not sure.  It's probably a DB constraint or legacy RHN requirement.
>> However, if you would like it changed, just run it through your BA
>> for the maintenance team.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>> ----- "Mike Amburn" <mamburn> wrote:
>>
>>> Can you explain why greeting (Mr/Mrs/Dr/Sr) is a required field for
>>> registering a new user through UGC?
>>>
>>> https://www.redhat.com/wapps/ugc/register.html

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Tom Mirc 2009-04-16 21:28:17 UTC
From: "Robbie Riggs II" <rriggs>

Below is Bill [Pinkstaff's] response:

'I do not believe any systems depend on it, to the best of my knowledge 
it is either not required or optional throughout our applications.'

It should be okay to move forward.


Suzy Tahmaseb wrote:
> I don't see any issue with it.

> Suzy Tahmaseb
> Customer Data Manager
> Global Operations Team


> Jessica Green wrote:
>> Tom,

>> There is no business need for salutation from a Customer Service 
>> standpoint, and as far as I know, none of our systems rely on that 
>> field; (but to know for sure, has this always been a requirement or 
>> was it optional at any point?).  Suzy, please jump in if you think we 
>> will ever need metrics on this for any reason.  Once this is 
>> approved, it will be worth running by Bill Pinkstaff to verify that 
>> Oracle / iSupport do not have any dependencies on the field.

>> Thanks,
>> Jessica

Comment 2 David Spalding 2011-01-31 17:39:14 UTC
Bugs are no longer tracked under this classification. CSP is now monitored in 
Other | Customer Portal | Integrated app: JBoss CSP. 

Please refile any current defect records or RFEs under the current 
classification.

Comment 3 David Spalding 2011-01-31 17:47:21 UTC
Bugs are no longer tracked under this classification. CSP is now monitored in 
Other | Customer Portal | Integrated app: JBoss CSP. 

Please refile any current defect records or RFEs under the current 
classification.