Bug 492405

Summary: rhnlib either needs to Require python-sgmlop or _internal_xmlrpclib.py needs to be removed.
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Reporter: Brandon Perkins <bperkins>
Component: rhnlibAssignee: Pradeep Kilambi <pkilambi>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Preethi Thomas <pthomas>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.7CC: atodorov, pthomas
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-05-18 20:14:49 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 492288    

Description Brandon Perkins 2009-03-26 18:19:28 UTC
Description of problem:
rhnlib either needs to Require python-sgmlop or _internal_xmlrpclib.py needs to be removed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhnlib-2.1.2-11.el4


How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. # grep 'import sgmlop' /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/rhn/_internal_xmlrpclib.py
    import sgmlop
2. # rpm -q --whatrequires python-sgmlop
no package requires python-sgmlop

  
Actual results:
This file is here, but there is no requires for python-sgmlop in rhnlib.

Expected results:
Either:
rhnlib requires python-sgmlop
or
/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/rhn/_internal_xmlrpclib.py needs to be removed.

Additional info:
Found while working on:   Bug 492288 -  Package python-sgmlop is not Required by anything on Satellite 5.3.0, we might want to not ship it

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2009-05-18 20:14:49 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0974.html