Bug 492810 (RabbIT)
Summary: | Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Pavel Alexeev <pahan> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Simon <cassmodiah> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | cassmodiah, fedora-package-review, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | cassmodiah:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 4.1-9.el5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-11-20 23:26:00 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 495411 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Pavel Alexeev
2009-03-29 21:04:35 UTC
I contact author and now convert LICENSE and LICENSE.txt files in UTF-8 from iso-8859-1. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/RabbIT/RabbIT-3.17-4.fc9.src.rpm Spec URL is the same. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/RabbIT/RabbIT-3.18-5.fc9.src.rpm new upstream release. One serious bug fixed. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Pre-built_JAR_files_.2F_Other_bundled_software dnsjava is bundled, but you are lucky, dnsjava is okay and comes without "shipping external dependencies". please package dnsjava, remove the dnsjava.jar in rabbit and build it against dnsjava package! If I correctly understand you I must package dnsjava into separate rpm package "and submit it on review? Or delete it from RabbIT and swith on non-threaded DNSSunHandler in default config? you have to remove the bundled jars. (in your case you have only one jar, dnsjava) build dnsjaa from source as an extra package, with an extra review. this review should set as "depends on dnsjava-review" In examples from Guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java) groups "Development Documentation" and "Development/Documentation" both incorrect ot rpmlint wrong say about it?? I set it to simple Documentation now... And ok, I submit dnsjava as separate package, please review both. New package http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/RabbIT/RabbIT-3.18-6.fc9.src.rpm which uses system wide dnsjava. LINE 105 you wrote: /sbin/chkconfig --del httpd should be: /sbin/chkconfig --del %{name} or not?! $ rpmlint *.fc11.*.rpm RabbIT.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary RabbIT RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18 rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/access rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/allowed rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/public/smallRabbIT3.png rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/cache_only.conf rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/RabbIT.conf rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/README rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/nocache.conf rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/index.html rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/technical_documentation/thread_handling_overview.txt rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/users rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/public rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/LICENSE rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/RabbIT rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/README.txt rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/menu.html rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/public/NoAd.gif rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/ChangeLog rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/TODO rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/LICENSE.txt rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/java/RabbIT-3.18.jar rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/javadoc rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/bin/RabbIT rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/htdocs/technical_documentation rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/Help.txt rabbit RabbIT.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/rc.d/init.d/rabbit 0700 RabbIT.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /etc/rc.d/init.d/rabbit 0700 RabbIT.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/RabbIT RabbIT.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun userdel RabbIT.noarch: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/rabbit RabbIT.noarch: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/rabbit RabbIT} RabbIT.noarch: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/rabbit RabbIT.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/java/RabbIT-3.18.jar RabbIT.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary RabbIT 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 33 warnings. (In reply to comment #8) > LINE 105 > you wrote: > /sbin/chkconfig --del httpd > should be: > /sbin/chkconfig --del %{name} > or not?! Thank you! I'm copy it form httpd and accidentally forgot change name. Fixed. About other errors I wrote in first message. For what you post it again? Do you think what any of them must be fixed? Additionally I fill bug on rpmlint for mentioned error - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498107 And one question. Should I delete user in %postun If I add it in %post? Rpmlint fire warning about it as dangerous operation. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/RabbIT/RabbIT-3.18-7.fc9.src.rpm uuuh, this is still open?! I demonstrated more than once, that i am not able to do reviews, but i will take a look in it in the next few days. (In reply to comment #10) > uuuh, this is still open?! Yes, it is. > I demonstrated more than once, that i am not able to do reviews, but i will > take a look in it in the next few days. Do not hesitate! Do you want set review flag and assign it for self? === REVIEW RabbIT === template: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#Things_To_Check_On_Review * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. FAIL: RabbIT.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary RabbIT The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary brief and to the point without including redundant information in it. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18 rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/access rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/RabbIT/htdocs/public/smallRabbIT3.png rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/RabbIT/htdocs/public rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/cache_only.conf rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/Help.txt rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/RabbIT.conf rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/README rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/RabbIT/htdocs rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/nocache.conf rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/users rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/LICENSE rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/allowed rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/RabbIT rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/RabbIT/htdocs/index.html rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/RabbIT/htdocs/javadoc rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/RabbIT/htdocs/menu.html rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/RabbIT/htdocs/technical_documentation rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/RabbIT/htdocs/LICENSE.txt rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/TODO rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/bin/RabbIT rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/RabbIT/htdocs/technical_documentation/thread_handling_overview.txt rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/java/RabbIT-3.18.jar rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/ChangeLog rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/RabbIT/htdocs/README.txt rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/RabbIT/htdocs/public/NoAd.gif rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/RabbIT This package contains files in /var/log/ without adding logrotate configuration for them. RabbIT.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun userdel RabbIT.noarch: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/RabbIT The package contains an init script that does not contain one of the LSB init script comment block convention keywords that are recommendable for all init scripts. If there is nothing to add to a keyword's value, include the keyword in the script with an empty value. Note that as of version 3.2, the LSB specification does not mandate presence of any keywords. RabbIT.noarch: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/RabbIT RabbIT} The filename of your lock file in /var/lock/subsys/ is incoherent with your actual init script name. For example, if your script name is httpd, you have to use 'httpd' as the filename in your subsys directory. It is also possible that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments. These cases usually manifest themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'; in these cases a warning instead of an error is reported and you should check the script manually. RabbIT.noarch: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/RabbIT In your init script (/etc/rc.d/init.d/your_file), you don't have a 'reload' entry, which is necessary for good functionality. RabbIT.noarch: W: incoherent-init-script-name RabbIT The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case, or one with 'd' appended if it invokes a process by that name. RabbIT.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/java/RabbIT-3.18.jar The META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file in the jar contains a hardcoded Class-Path. These entries do not work with older Java versions and even if they do work, they are inflexible and usually cause nasty surprises. RabbIT.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary RabbIT The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary brief and to the point without including redundant information in it. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 34 warnings. * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. O.K. * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. O.K. * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. FAIL - BUILDROOT-Tag -> O.K. - No internal libs -> O.K. - TIMESTAMPS -> O.K. - File Permissions -> FAIL * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. O.K. * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. O.K. * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. O.K. * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. O.K. * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. O.K. * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. O.K. my DL: .:[ cassmodiah @ schafwiese : /home/cassmodiah/Desktop ]:. $ md5sum RabbIT3-src.tar.gz 49c4c7c568e4b47960601297d26c5efb RabbIT3-src.tar.gz extract from package: .:[ cassmodiah @ schafwiese : /home/cassmodiah/rpmbuild/SOURCES ]:. $ md5sum RabbIT3-src.tar.gz 49c4c7c568e4b47960601297d26c5efb RabbIT3-src.tar.gz * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. O.K. BuildArchitectures: noarch * MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. O.K. * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. O.K. * MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. O.K. * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. FAIL * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). O.K. * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. O.K. * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. O.K. * MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). N/A * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. O.K. * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. N/A * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. FAIL * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). O.K. * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. O.K. SHOULD Items: Items marked as SHOULD are things that the package (or reviewer) SHOULD do, but is not required to do. * SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A * SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. N/A, but O.K. * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. O.K. * SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. O.K. * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. N/A * SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. O.K. * SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A * SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. O.K. * SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. O.K. ----- TODO: - update to RabbIT 4 - try to contact upstream - he/she/it should use name and version as source, not only mainversion. - don't own with the rabbit-user the whole package - remove my name from your changelog - don't use packagename in summary - own %{_datadir}/%{name}/ instead of %{_datadir}/%{name}/htdocs - you can use a macro in source0; %{name}3 instead of RabbIT3 - make your package RPMLINT-conform: ~ remove class path in manifest ~ you can't avoid all user-messages from rpmlint (/var/run/ and so is okay for rabbit) ~ userdel is okay ~ add a logrotate for log-files ~ make your init.d-script conform ~ check your user and your service name - you have rabbit and RabbIT -> just use rabbit for all * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. O.K. * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. FAIL My fault.... (In reply to comment #13) I really don't understand for what you again post so much warning data mentioned twice previously... > TODO: > - update to RabbIT 4 Good suggestion. Done. > - try to contact upstream - he/she/it should use name and version as source, > not only mainversion. I contact them. He answer what do that, but now in vacation around 2 or 3 weeks. > - don't own with the rabbit-user the whole package Ok. > - remove my name from your changelog Really strange request... But off course ok. > - don't use packagename in summary Ok. > - own %{_datadir}/%{name}/ instead of %{_datadir}/%{name}/htdocs Ok. > - you can use a macro in source0; %{name}3 instead of RabbIT3 Ok. But %lname, not %name. > - make your package RPMLINT-conform: > ~ remove class path in manifest There problem. If I remove it, I get error on start: # ./RabbIT Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/xbill/DNS/Lookup at rabbit.dns.DNSJavaHandler.setup(DNSJavaHandler.java:32) at rabbit.proxy.HttpProxy.setupDNSHandler(HttpProxy.java:171) at rabbit.proxy.HttpProxy.setConfig(HttpProxy.java:272) at rabbit.proxy.HttpProxy.setConfig(HttpProxy.java:136) at rabbit.proxy.ProxyStarter.startProxy(ProxyStarter.java:66) at rabbit.proxy.ProxyStarter.start(ProxyStarter.java:60) at rabbit.proxy.ProxyStarter.main(ProxyStarter.java:18) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.xbill.DNS.Lookup at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:217) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:323) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:294) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:268) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:336) ... 7 more and don't known what do around this :( > ~ you can't avoid all user-messages from rpmlint (/var/run/ and so is okay > for rabbit) I known :) > ~ userdel is okay Thank you for clarification. > ~ add a logrotate for log-files For what if it has inner mechanism of log rotation?? Just rpmlint can't known about this. > ~ make your init.d-script conform Conform to what?? > ~ check your user and your service name - you have rabbit and RabbIT -> just > use rabbit for all Ok, I use rabbit now for service and service file. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/RabbIT/RabbIT-4.0-8.fc11.src.rpm http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/RabbIT/RabbIT.spec Warning: this build is NOT run! Please see class-path error described before. I'm continue investigation. Help appreciated. Robert Oloffson kindly change version enumeration by my request, now tarball have version and release. Also new 4.1 version. I still don't known what do with classpath. Help is highly appreciated. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/RabbIT/RabbIT-4.1-9.fc11.src.rpm I promise you i will take a look this week! ------ > ~ make your init.d-script conform Conform to what?? ------ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript you are missing a reload function ----- > ~ add a logrotate for log-files For what if it has inner mechanism of log rotation?? Just rpmlint can't known about this. ----- You can read some stuff about logrotate in the logrotate manpage --- RabbIT.spec Source1: %{lname}.logrotate .. .. # install log rotation stuff mkdir -p %{buildroot}/etc/logrotate.d install -pm0644 %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}/etc/logrotate.d/%{lname} .. .. %attr(600,%{lname},root) %ghost %{_localstatedir}/log/%{name}/main_run.log .. %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/%{lname} --- please don't give read and execute acess to users log files dont need execute (for root, too) --- rabbit.logrotate /var/log/rabbit/*log { weekly notifempty missingok } --- After you changed that, package should be okay. (In reply to comment #18) > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript > you are missing a reload function Yes, I known. I speak that initially. I think ignore rpmlint warning is best solution instead of add empty reload stub. > You can read some stuff about logrotate in the logrotate manpage Off course I can. But for what? I known basis. If I add files for logrotate it will conflict with inner system of log rotation. So, we got one or both logs corrupted, nothing else. In this case I can try search way to replace inner method by logrotate one, but really I should do that? Yeah, there is an inner log rotation. I tested it. My fault. Haven't recognize that. You are using the classpathremoving sed-command from the java-guidelines of the wiki. perhaps a bug of rpmlint? I tried to make rpmlint silence in this case, but I failed. Package is okay and works for me on F10 ppc and F11 ppc. APPROVED Simon Wesp, thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: Short Description: Owners: hubbitus Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: Can you fill in the name and description and reset the fedora-cvs flag when you are ready? Oh, Kevin Fenzi my apologizes. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: RabbIT Short Description: proxy for a faster web Owners: hubbitus Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: no problem... and sorry for the delay here. cvs done. RabbIT-4.1-9.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/RabbIT-4.1-9.fc10 RabbIT-4.1-9.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/RabbIT-4.1-9.fc11 RabbIT-4.1-9.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/RabbIT-4.1-9.el5 RabbIT-4.1-9.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update RabbIT'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0780 RabbIT-4.1-9.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. RabbIT-4.1-9.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. RabbIT-4.1-9.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |