Bug 493463
Summary: | Some font cleanup | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot> |
Component: | mscore | Assignee: | Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 11 | CC: | oget.fedora |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-06-12 04:43:00 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Nicolas Mailhot
2009-04-01 20:18:14 UTC
1. eh... ok. 2. I can't, at least not with the existing macros. I think I explained this to you before. For instance, when I use %_font_pkg -n %{fontfamilyname} %{fontfamilyname}*.ttf the macro opens up and I have %files mscore-%{fontfamilyname}-fonts If I instead use %_font_pkg %{fontfamilyname}*.ttf the macro opens up as %files and I have two %files sections. (Also two %post, %postun sections). RPM doesn't like duplications. So what will be your suggestion? How can I produce a mscore-fonts package? 3. I can make them noarch, but there's no guideline that says I should. (In reply to comment #1) > 2. I can't, at least not with the existing macros. Yes, mscore-fonts is not possible indeed. This is the one corner case current macros can't cover. mscore-1-fonts would be possible, but don't know if it would be a good idea to have inconsistent naming between the two packages. > 3. I can make them noarch, but there's no guideline that says I should. It's a good idea to do it when you have pure noarch subpackages. Mirror people will thank you I don't think mscore1 is a totally different font family than mscore. They are both derived from lilypond's feta fonts, and they are just for musical notation, no actual letter glyphs etc. I think upstream named them mscore and mscore1 for their own convenience. (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > 2. I can't, at least not with the existing macros. > > Yes, mscore-fonts is not possible indeed. This is the one corner case current > macros can't cover I've cut a new version that should cover your use case Can you please check if http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/ works for you? If that's the case, I'll publish it as an official version Thanks for the update! Yes it works. By "it works" I mean that I was able to produce a "mscore-fonts" package. Now I'll have to add an Obsoletes/Provides: mscore-mscore-fonts. Let me know when you update fontpackages on F-11 so I'll rebuild with this change. Just FYI, I am not further splitting the mscore-fonts in two packages as I explained in comment #3. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle. Changing version to '11'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Package updated and built in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=105820 Closing the bug |