Bug 493657
| Summary: | Jabber ports, is 5269 needed? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite 5 | Reporter: | wes hayutin <whayutin> |
| Component: | Docs Installation Guide | Assignee: | John Ha <jha> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | ecs-bugs |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 530 | CC: | adstrong, casmith, cperry, ipilcher |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/satellite/Red_Hat_Network_Satellite-5.2.0/html/Proxy_Installation_Guide/s1-requirements-additional.html | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-09-13 21:05:11 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 608749 | ||
|
Description
wes hayutin
2009-04-02 14:31:14 UTC
<whayutin_> so I'm wondering if 5269 is really necessary? <msuchy> whayutin_: aha, you mean for jabberd? <whayutin_> ya <whayutin_> wondering if it worked due to A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT <msuchy> whayutin_: according to quick google search jabberd can live with 5222, 5223, 5269, and 8010 <msuchy> so it is enough if you open one of them <cliff-hm> whayutin_, its possible docs are incorrect - file a bug, we prob align it to 540 though, since english docs are froozen <whayutin_> :) thanks guys 5269 is needed in both directions between the satellite server and the proxy server. As per comment #2 - notabug. |