Bug 493689
| Summary: | branch ipvsadm for EPEL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Kevin Fenzi <kevin> |
| Component: | ipvsadm | Assignee: | Matthias Saou <matthias> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 11 | CC: | matthias |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-06-28 19:34:18 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Kevin Fenzi
2009-04-02 17:04:51 UTC
Is there an existing policy for this? Because one might indeed argue that a Red Hat package already exists... Well, it's been discussed, but I don't know that we ever came to a policy. ;( I can re-open discussion on the epel-devel list I guess. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle. Changing version to '11'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping I think we can just drop this for now. Centos has the package, rhel has it in a cluster channel. The subpackage that needs it is no longer required by base heartbeat, so people could just remove that subpackage if they don't want to pull this in. |