Bug 494414

Summary:	vgcfgrestore can segfault if some PV is missing
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Corey Marthaler <cmarthal>
Component:	lvm2	Assignee:	Milan Broz <mbroz>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Cluster QE <mspqa-list>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	5.3	CC:	agk, cmarthal, dwysocha, edamato, heinzm, jbrassow, mbroz, prockai, pvrabec, syeghiay
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	491902	Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-09-02 11:56:39 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	491902
Bug Blocks:

Comment 2 Milan Broz 2009-04-06 20:01:20 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #491902 +++

Description of problem:

# pvcreate /dev/sd[bc]
  Physical volume "/dev/sdb" successfully created
  Physical volume "/dev/sdc" successfully created
# vgcreate vg_test /dev/sd[bc]
  Volume group "vg_test" successfully created
# vgcfgbackup -f vg_test vg_test
  Volume group "vg_test" successfully backed up.

now some PV is lost...

# pvremove -ff /dev/sdb
...
  Labels on physical volume "/dev/sdb" successfully wiped

# vgcfgrestore -f vg_test vg_test
  Couldn't find device with uuid 'jYyR3Q-G601-hQYa-XLuB-z3Bb-nP1s-Bx8dYd'.
Segmentation fault

Comment 4 Milan Broz 2009-05-21 09:22:22 UTC

Fix in version lvm2-2.02.46-1.el5.

Comment 6 Corey Marthaler 2009-07-01 17:24:34 UTC

Fix verified in lvm2-2.02.46-8.el5.

[root@grant-01 ~]# vgcfgrestore -f vg_test vg_test
  Couldn't find device with uuid 'rCJ1rb-9NJr-beHf-FST8-7UAw-9EQ7-8ILI48'.
  Cannot restore Volume Group vg_test with 1 PVs marked as missing.
  Restore failed.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2009-09-02 11:56:39 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1393.html