Bug 494520
Summary: | Review Request: cdf - The NASA Common Data Format implementation | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Susi Lehtola <susi.lehtola> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak> |
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | alexis.jeandet, fedora-package-review, lkundrak, notting, tcallawa |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-05-27 20:45:34 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 182235 |
Description
Susi Lehtola
2009-04-07 09:59:43 UTC
Blocking FE-LEGAL due to Copyright: Copyright 2008 Space Physics Data Facility NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center This software may be copied or redistributed as long as it is not sold for profit, but it can be incorporated into any other substantive product with or without modifications for profit or non-profit. If the software is modified, it must include the following notices: - The software is not the original (for protectiion of the original author's reputations from any problems introduced by others) - Change history (e.g. date, functionality, etc.) This copyright notice must be reproduced on each copy made. This software is provided as is without any express or implied warranties whatsoever. Sorry Jussi, this license is poorly worded and non-free. NASA can put a man in space, but they can't seem to write a good FOSS license (they have a history of writing bad ones). So, at this point review may seem pointless. Jussi, are you going to talk to them about the license? To me it seems that they didn't willingly make the software non-free and that they may agree to relicensing under the terms of 3-clause BSD or MIT license. (In reply to comment #3) > So, at this point review may seem pointless. Jussi, are you going to talk to > them about the license? To me it seems that they didn't willingly make the > software non-free and that they may agree to relicensing under the terms of > 3-clause BSD or MIT license. Yeah, there's no point in doing the review if the license is not compatible. I contacted upstream about the license issue. Ugh, no reply. Closing as deferred. If the license changes this can be picked up. Hi, I contacted the cdf developers, they told me that they are really in favor of an open source license but they have to deal with lawyer stuff... So we can expect to get the lib cdf with a compatible license soon. Best regards, Alexis. |