Bug 495365
| Summary: | yum sorts packages to download by size | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | JanS <jan.skowron> |
| Component: | yum | Assignee: | Seth Vidal <skvidal> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 10 | CC: | axet, ffesti, james.antill, pmatilai, robatino, tim.lauridsen |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-04-13 17:00:01 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
JanS
2009-04-12 11:38:14 UTC
I remember reading somewhere that the justification was that if the download was interrupted, one would have the largest possible number of downloaded packages. I'm not sure if I buy that as a good enough reason. Interestingly, the most recent rawhide version of yum has reverted to downloading packages alphabetically rather than in order of increasing size. Don't know yet whether that's deliberate or a regression. We don't currently know the "smallest independent dependency tree", so we can't currently sort that way. When we can get that info., we might change it ... feel free to open an RFE at that time (although plugins make this somewhat painful).
> Interestingly, the most recent rawhide version of yum has reverted to
> downloading packages alphabetically
This was changed explicitly to reduce the number of BZs like this.
Is here any plugin to make yum sort packages by size :) i really love this feature? |