Bug 496057
Summary: | Anaconda (Install) doesn't use multipath tools information during install with option "mpath" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | IBM Bug Proxy <bugproxy> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Peter Jones <pjones> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 5.3 | CC: | ddumas, jyundt |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-07-02 02:31:06 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
IBM Bug Proxy
2009-04-16 11:30:32 UTC
------- Comment From sekharan.com 2009-05-05 13:53 EDT------- RedHat, Any update on this bug ? ------- Comment From sharyath.com 2009-05-26 01:34 EDT------- Red Hat Any update on this bug Thanks Hi, This is proposed for 5.5, which has not yet opened for development. When it opens, we will review all of the proposed bugzillas and ack or nak them. ------- Comment From sharyath.com 2009-06-04 02:56 EDT------- Deferring it to RHEL 5.5 ------- Comment From brking.com 2009-07-13 16:08 EDT------- *** Bug 54649 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- Comment From sekharan.com 2009-07-29 19:02 EDT------- Dear RedHat, Can this problem be fixed in RHEL 6 ? (since it is a major release, it will be nice if we can have the "linux mpath" install work for all multipath devices). ------- Comment From sharyath.com 2009-11-03 04:24 EDT------- Red Hat Any chances of it to be included in RHEL 6 or should we defer it to RHEL 5.5 Thanks ------- Comment From sharyath.com 2009-11-17 12:30 EDT------- RedHat Any update on the request Your best chance of getting this in is to submit a patch upstream, which we could then retrofit to RHEL6 and finally RHEL5 (although that multipath code base is significantly different so it would certainly not be a straight backport). But we're out of capacity ATM. ------- Comment From sekharan.com 2009-11-17 13:51 EDT------- What do you mean by upstream ? Fedora ? Note that the code change needed is not in kernel, but in the install scripts. In the upstream of whatever component you want to change. In this case, for the installer, Fedora is the upstream. ------- Comment From sharyath.com 2010-01-22 02:43 EDT------- Redhat Do let me know how to proceed with this bug. We mirrored it to Red Hat Bugzilla thinking thats the right place. Do let us know what do you mean by Upstream in this case, as we thought by mirroring to Red Hat bugzilla we already have brought to the noticed of Fedora team. Thanks Sharyathi ------- Comment From sharyath.com 2010-02-03 01:33 EDT------- Red Hat Team any updates ------- Comment From sharyath.com 2010-03-26 07:18 EDT------- Red Hat any update here ------- Comment From edpollar.com 2010-06-16 11:58 EDT------- reassigning qa.... This should be working under RHEL 6. Marking this as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. |