Bug 496525

Summary: Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: akurtako, fedora-package-review, notting
Target Milestone: ---Flags: akurtako: fedora-review+
j: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-05-30 02:29:43 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 496524    
Bug Blocks: 492197    

Description Orcan Ogetbil 2009-04-19 22:17:40 UTC
Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tritonus.spec
SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tritonus-0.3.7-0.1.20090419cvs.src.rpm
Description:
Tritonus is an implementation of the Java Sound API. This package contains
common files and shared classes required by all other Tritonus plug-ins.


There are three kinds of rpmlints:
   tritonus.x86_64: E: no-binary
   tritonus.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
Some tritonus packages contain JNI files and therefore they are binary specific. For consistency, I put all tritonus jar files and JNI so files in %{_libdir}/%{name}. I think this is reasonable to do, but unfortunately it results in the above RPMs.

   tritonus-src.x86_64: W: no-documentation
Not all the subpackages have docs associated with them.

Comment 1 Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-07 06:51:54 UTC
I'm taking this one.

Comment 2 Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-07 06:58:01 UTC
Some of the non-versioned jars in /usr/lib/tritonus are copies not symlinks:
-tritonus_share.jar
-tritonus_core.jar
-tritonus_gsm.jar
-tritonus_remaining.jar
Once this is fixed I'll do the formal review.

Comment 3 Orcan Ogetbil 2009-05-07 08:05:39 UTC
Uh, I fixed it. What a messed up Makefile...

Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tritonus.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tritonus-0.3.7-0.2.20090419cvs.src.rpm

Changelog: 0.3.7-0.2.20090419cvs
- Fix duplicate files issue

Comment 4 Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-28 11:58:54 UTC
Review:
OK; rpmlint shows a number of warnings. But the packager already explained them and I agree that they are not a problem. 
OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. 
OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines .
OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK: License is included in %doc.
OK: The spec file must be written in American English. 
OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK: Script for fetching sources is included.
OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. 
OK: BuildRequires are good
OK: No duplicate entries in %files listings.
OK: Permissions on files are good
OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). 
OK: Each package must consistently use macros. 
OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. Javadoc are in separate package.
OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. 
OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). 
OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. 

Package is APPROVED.

Comment 5 Orcan Ogetbil 2009-05-29 01:25:07 UTC
Thank you very much!

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: tritonus
Short Description: Java Sound API Implementation
Owners: oget
Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11
InitialCC:

Comment 6 Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-29 04:53:06 UTC
CVS done.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 06:00:33 UTC
tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 06:01:14 UTC
tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc10

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 06:02:05 UTC
tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc9

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2009-05-30 02:29:38 UTC
tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2009-05-30 02:30:37 UTC
tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2009-05-30 02:36:18 UTC
tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.