Bug 496724
Summary: | fence_drac5 uses module_name instead of modulename | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Vinny Valdez <vvaldez> | ||||||||
Component: | cman | Assignee: | Marek Grac <mgrac> | ||||||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Cluster QE <mspqa-list> | ||||||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||||
Priority: | low | ||||||||||
Version: | 5.3 | CC: | cfeist, cluster-maint, cward, edamato, mgrac, praveen_paladugu, rlerch, rmccabe, sbradley, tao | ||||||||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
Fixed In Version: | cman-2.0.101-1.el5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||||||
Doc Text: |
Cause: Fence agent fence_drac5 does not support same variable as fence_drac
Consequences: Unable to use previously written scripts with new agent
Fix: Added compatibility layer to support both modulename and module_name
Result: Full backward compatibility for supported models.
|
Story Points: | --- | ||||||||
Clone Of: | |||||||||||
: | 500546 (view as bug list) | Environment: | |||||||||
Last Closed: | 2009-09-02 11:10:22 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||||||
Bug Blocks: | 500546 | ||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Vinny Valdez
2009-04-20 20:17:58 UTC
Created attachment 340789 [details] fence_drac5 and fencing.py: patches and files with patch applied This file contains the /sbin/fence_drac5 and /usr/lib/fence/fencing.py that have had patches applied to them. The file also contains the patches as well. These files had the patch BZ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462390 applied to them to fix another issue. Patched fence_drac5 and fencing.py contain patches for 2 BZs. A separate ticket should be opened against the fence agent and the patches should be posted there. Fencing agent with support for this device is in git tree. It is extending fence_drac5 - detection of device is done automatically after login. The patch in the tarball was generated incorrectly. Please disregard the patch, but the patched files are correct. Created attachment 342307 [details]
fence_drac5 and fencing.py with modulename patch
Uploaded the new patches for fencing.py and fence_drac5.
The previous ones were incorrectly created.
Should the patches for the agent be posted in Bug 466788 as Ryan mentioned in Commend #3? This bug only refers to Conga's support of the fencing agent. Created attachment 343719 [details]
Patch to add compatibile layer
Patch adds support for modulename (same way as we work with other obsolete options).
Release note added. If any revisions are required, please set the "requires_release_notes" flag to "?" and edit the "Release Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: Cause: Fence agent fence_drac5 does not support same variable as fence_drac Consequences: Unable to use previously written scripts with new agent Fix: Added compatibility layer to support both modulename and module_name Result: Full backward compatibility for supported models. Release note added. ~~ Attention - RHEL 5.4 Beta Released! ~~ RHEL 5.4 Beta has been released! There should be a fix present in the Beta release that addresses this particular request. Please test and report back results here, at your earliest convenience. RHEL 5.4 General Availability release is just around the corner! If you encounter any issues while testing Beta, please describe the issues you have encountered and set the bug into NEED_INFO. If you encounter new issues, please clone this bug to open a new issue and request it be reviewed for inclusion in RHEL 5.4 or a later update, if it is not of urgent severity. Please do not flip the bug status to VERIFIED. Only post your verification results, and if available, update Verified field with the appropriate value. Questions can be posted to this bug or your customer or partner representative. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1341.html |