Bug 497231

Summary: sectool in F-11 older than in F-10
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta>
Component: sectoolAssignee: Peter Vrabec <pvrabec>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 11CC: dkopecek, jhrozek, pvrabec, tmraz
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Patch
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-08-05 11:34:35 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS none

Description Ville Skyttä 2009-04-22 21:37:20 UTC 
Created attachment 340833 [details]
Use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-April/msg01233.html

Fix attached.  I also see that F-11 and devel branches in CVS lag behind F-10 and the sectool going into F-11 (0.9.1-9) is older than what's currently in F-10 updates (0.9.2-4.fc10), please consider fixing that while at it.
Comment 1 Ville Skyttä 2009-05-20 21:50:05 UTC 
Patch applied and built in Rawhide as 0.9.2-5, but sectool in F-11 (0.9.1) is still older than in F-10 (0.9.2).
Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 14:26:09 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle.
Changing version to '11'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 3 Peter Vrabec 2009-08-05 11:34:08 UTC 
fixed now.
sectool-0.9.2-4.fc10
sectool-0.9.3-2.fc11
sectool-0.9.3-3.fc12