Bug 498073
| Summary: | Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jeroen van Meeuwen <vanmeeuwen+fedora> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | contribs, fedora-package-review, lmacken, mspevack, notting, vanmeeuwen+fedora |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-01-10 21:27:48 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 201449 | ||
|
Description
Yaakov Nemoy
2009-04-28 18:58:00 UTC
I am unable to get this package working in F10 with spython-sqlalchemy-0.4.8-1.fc10
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/ekg-scan", line 16, in <module>
import ekg.model
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ekg/model.py", line 112, in <module>
Base = declarative_base(metadata=metadata, cls=SqlBase, metaclass=MetaSqlBase)
TypeError: declarative_base() got an unexpected keyword argument 'cls'
I should do a better job packaging. This needs SA 0.5. Stay tuned for an updated package in the next couple of days. Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ekg.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ekg-0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Since i upgraded to setuptools along with fixing the dependencies, i decided this needed a new upstream release. Anyways, that should force the issue. If you need a 0.5.x SA package in F10, you should pull the SRPM from koji and rebuild it, because just installing from rawhide will try to pull the new python and everything else in too. BTW, to anyone declaring intent to review, there is a new version upstream, ping here to let me know to upload the latest upstream. - the description is "too long": make it a little paragraph if you will - mixed use of spaces and tabs in .spec - the Source0 should be a complete URL Friendly ping to Yaakov ;-) Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ekg.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ekg-0.4.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ekg.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ekg-0.4.3-2.fc11.src.rpm Minor error: $ rpmlint /home/jmeeuwen/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/python-ekg-0.4.3-2.fc11.noarch.rpm python-ekg.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ekg/migration/manage.py 0644 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Suggest to remove the shebang from that file if possible. Setting the fedora-review flag as it seems to have been overlooked. Seeing as this particular code -- python-ekg -- is not being actively worked on, I just wanted those reading this bug to realize that this package review, and our desire to get this code packaged into Fedora's repositories, is not urgent right now. If at some point we have more resources, or folks interested in python-ekg, perhaps we'll ressurect this package review. For the time being, the EKG project is trying to proceed in a different direction. Max, are you suggesting that this review ticket should be closed out? I suppose you could leave it open if neither Jeroen nor Yaakov mind, but it sounds like there's not much point in proceeding at this point. It's up to Yaakov and Max ;-) The only reason I commented here yesterday anyway was for the sake of cleanliness, and in that same spirit, I think this review request can be closed, and re-opened or a new one created if necessary at a future point. Removing myself for these bug components as I'm either no longer involved in that aspect of the project, or no longer care to watch this particular bug. Sorry if you are caught in a maelstrom of bug changes as a result! Stalled review, SPEC and SRPM are not accessible anymore. Closing. |