Bug 498383

Summary: man page of blkrawverify contains a different utility name in its SYNOPSIS section
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Milos Malik <mmalik>
Component: blktraceAssignee: Eric Sandeen <esandeen>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: BaseOS QE <qe-baseos-auto>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 5.3CC: ohudlick
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-09-02 09:41:29 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Milos Malik 2009-04-30 08:26:42 UTC
Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
blktrace-1.0.0-3.el5

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
# man blkrawverify | col -b | head -n 14 | uniq
BLKRAWVERIFY(1)                                                BLKRAWVERIFY(1)

NAME
       blkrawverify - verifies an output file produced by blkparse

SYNOPSIS
       verify_blkparse <dev> [<dev>...]

  
Actual results:
both NAME and SYNOPSIS sections talk about different utilities

Expected results:
both NAME and SYNOPSIS sections talk about the same utility

Additional info:

Comment 1 Eric Sandeen 2009-05-04 20:56:49 UTC
Patch sent upstream, thanks.  This was a problem on a couple other manpages as well.

http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrace&m=124146824114158&w=2

Comment 3 Eric Sandeen 2009-05-13 22:54:05 UTC
Committed & built in blktrace-1.0.0-6.el5

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2009-09-02 09:41:29 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2009-1284.html