Bug 498845
| Summary: | Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Denis Arnaud <denis.arnaud_fedora> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jason Tibbitts <j> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | bugs.michael, fedora-package-review, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | j:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 0.9.1-1.fc11 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-06-16 01:24:51 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 498846 | ||
|
Description
Denis Arnaud
2009-05-03 23:06:57 UTC
This builds fine and rpmlint is silent except for the two complaints that it always spews for R packages. The license is a bit unclear. DESCRIPTION says "GPL-2", but src/pijt.c (the only other file that seems to have a license uses the FSF-recommended language and says GPLv2+. Can you clarify with upstream whether the code is GPLv2 only or GPLv2+? Upstream seems to be active. Why is the %check section commented out? * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 7dd0e5ce54e67afe7ea40b0ad127b270c7e822a29aaa3e7373fe465bb361026f msm_0.8.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: msm.so()(64bit) R-msm = 0.8.2-1.fc11 R-msm(x86-64) = 0.8.2-1.fc11 = /bin/sh R libR.so()(64bit) libRblas.so()(64bit) libRlapack.so()(64bit) libgfortran.so.3()(64bit) ? %check is present but commented out. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets are OK (R package registration) * code, not content. I have contacted upstream for the license issue, and shall keep you updated. (as a reminder, the upstream Web site is: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/msm/index.html) That's not the URL you have in your spec, but it really should be. Following is the answer from upstream (C. Jackson): "Thanks for pointing that out, it was an oversight. I will alter the DESCRIPTION file to put the whole package under GPL version 2 or later. I'm working on several updates and bug fixes at the moment, so I intend to release the next version with this change within the next two weeks." So, I shall update the specification file accordingly (hopefully this week-end), and re-deliver the new upstream version when available. If you want to release before those upstream cleanups are done, just include the correspondence clarifying the license as a %doc file in the package. 1. The README_License_msm file (http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/msm/082/2/README_License_msm) has been added, with the correspondence clarifying the license issue: that package follows GPLv2+. 2. The URL has been changed, so as to reflect the actual Web site of the R-msm package (http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/msm/index.html). 3. The %check was commented... because I forgot to uncomment it (I usually first test building packages without enabling the tests, as they take a lot of time) :) The new RPM package proposal is therefore below: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/msm/082/2/R-msm.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/msm/082/2/R-msm-0.8.2-2.fc10.src.rpm (to check the differences, the older versions are to be found at the following location: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/msm/082/1/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OK, this builds fine, the check section passes and the license clarification is fine. APPROVED New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-msm Short Description: Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time Owners: denisarnaud Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: We're still several months away from making F-12 branches for anything. Otherwise, CVS done. R-msm-0.9.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-msm-0.9.1-1.fc11 R-msm-0.9.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-msm-0.9.1-1.fc10 R-msm-0.9.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. R-msm-0.9.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: R-msm New Branches: F12 Owners: denisarnaud cvs done. |