Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Mark McLoughlin <markmc>|
|Component:||kernel||Assignee:||Kyle McMartin <kmcmartin>|
|Status:||CLOSED RAWHIDE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||11||CC:||dwmw2, itamar, kernel-maint, peterm, virt-maint|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2009-08-21 07:45:46 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:||490477|
|Bug Blocks:||513462, 498969|
Description Mark McLoughlin 2009-05-06 06:26:20 EDT
I've just noticed this: * Tue Mar 24 2009 Kyle McMartin <email@example.com> - Disable DMAR by default until suspend & resume is fixed. Later, we had this: * Fri Apr 10 2009 David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com> - Fix suspend/resume with Intel IOMMU, handle devices behind PCI-PCI bridges, cope with BIOS claiming IOMMU is at address zero. Should we re-enable it be default again? For reference, this is needed for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KVM_PCI_Device_Assignment - without CONFIG_DMAR_DEFAULT_ON people need to boot with "intel_iommu=on" in order to use device assignment
Comment 1 Chuck Ebbert 2009-05-07 00:48:58 EDT
I don't think we have nearly all the DMAR fixes that have gone into 2.6.30. (A few just got merged in the last few days.)
Comment 2 Mark McLoughlin 2009-05-07 05:34:40 EDT
Adding a known intel_iommu lockup as a dependency
Comment 3 David Woodhouse 2009-05-07 07:10:06 EDT
(In reply to comment #1) > I don't think we have nearly all the DMAR fixes that have gone into 2.6.30. (A > few just got merged in the last few days.) We should have everything that's needed. What do you think is missing?
Comment 4 Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 11:14:38 EDT
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle. Changing version to '11'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 5 Mark McLoughlin 2009-08-10 09:38:04 EDT
How are we looking for enabling this in F-12?
Comment 6 David Woodhouse 2009-08-10 10:06:48 EDT
Good, I think. I have some more BIOS workarounds which I can drop in now and re-enable it...
Comment 7 David Woodhouse 2009-08-10 10:28:18 EDT
OK, it's enabled. I'd quite like to drop the BROKEN_GFX_WA option too, but let's take things one step at a time...