Bug 500222

Summary:	selinux-policy should own /usr/share/selinux/packages
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jerry James <loganjerry>
Component:	selinux-policy	Assignee:	Daniel Walsh <dwalsh>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	dwalsh, jkubin, mgrepl
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
URL:	https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-selinux-list/2009-January/msg00058.html
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-05-15 15:18:06 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jerry James 2009-05-11 18:37:50 UTC

Description of problem:
As discussed in the thread rooted here:

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-selinux-list/2009-January/msg00058.html

the selinux-policy package should own /usr/share/selinux/packages.  In spite of what was said in that thread, this directory is still not owned by any package in F-10 or F-11.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
selinux-policy-3.5.13-58.fc10.noarch
selinux-policy-3.6.12-28.fc11.noarch

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Make sure selinux-policy is installed.
2. rpm -qf /usr/share/selinux/packages
  
Actual results:
file /usr/share/selinux/packages is not owned by any package

Expected results:
That directory should be owned by selinux-policy.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Miroslav Grepl 2009-05-15 15:14:40 UTC

Fixed in selinux-policy-3.5.13-60.fc10

Comment 2 Miroslav Grepl 2009-05-15 15:18:06 UTC

and also fixed in selinux-policy-3.6.12-37.fc11