Bug 500598

Summary: gpart-debuginfo is empty
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Alexander Todorov <atodorov>
Component: gpartAssignee: David Cantrell <dcantrell>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Alexander Todorov <atodorov>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 5.4   
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: gpart-0.1h-5.el5 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-11-26 07:52:39 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
gpart.spec
none
gpart-0.1h-cflags.patch none

Description Alexander Todorov 2009-05-13 12:11:01 UTC 
Description of problem:
gpart-debuginfo is empty although gpart package contains ELF object

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gpart-debuginfo-0.1h-3.1.i386.rpm

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -qpl gpart-debuginfo-0.1h-3.1.i386.rpm
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
empty package

Expected results:
package with useful debugging information

Additional info:
Comment 3 David Cantrell 2009-05-30 00:02:06 UTC 
This is an easy fix.  Update the Makefile patch and fix up the spec file.  Attached to this bug are updated versions of those (for my own record keeping).

Here's my test build:

https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/taskinfo?taskID=1820663

You can see the debuginfo package now contains things.
Comment 4 David Cantrell 2009-05-30 00:02:45 UTC 
Created attachment 345967 [details]
gpart.spec
Comment 5 David Cantrell 2009-05-30 00:03:07 UTC 
Created attachment 345968 [details]
gpart-0.1h-cflags.patch
Comment 7 Alexander Todorov 2009-11-10 09:03:50 UTC 
Moving to VERIFIED

$ rpm -qpl gpart-debuginfo-0.1h-5.el5.i386.rpm 
/usr/lib/debug
/usr/lib/debug/usr
/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin
/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/gpart.debug
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/disku.c
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_beos.c
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_beos.h
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_bsddl.c
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_bsddl.h
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_ext2.c
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_ext2.h
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_fat.c
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_fat.h
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_hmlvm.c
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_hmlvm.h
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_hpfs.c
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_hpfs.h
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_lswap.c
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_minix.c
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_minix.h
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_ntfs.c
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_qnx4.c
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_qnx4.h
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_rfs.c
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_rfs.h
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_s86dl.c
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_s86dl.h
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_xfs.c
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gm_xfs.h
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gmodules.c
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gmodules.h
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gpart.c
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/gpart.h
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/l64seek.c
/usr/src/debug/gpart-0.1h/src/l64seek.h
Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2009-11-26 07:52:39 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1606.html