Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Error Checksumming during bigger amount of packages|
|Product:||Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5||Reporter:||Petr Sklenar <psklenar>|
|Component:||yum||Assignee:||James Antill <james.antill>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security>|
|Version:||5.4||CC:||bperkins, jhutar, rlerch, sghosh|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
When yum installed local packages, it defaulted to expecting SHA-256 checksums. Because packages for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 use MD5 checksums, the installation would fail with a bad checksum type error. Now, when yum encounters a bad SHA-256 checksum, it attempts to verify the package with a SHA-1 checksum instead, which will sucessfully verify the MD5 checksums used for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 packages.
|Last Closed:||2009-09-02 03:33:16 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Petr Sklenar 2009-05-13 14:05:04 EDT
Created attachment 343835 [details] log, bad checksum type sha256 Description of problem: yum cannot install bigger amount of packages. There is checksum error during installation of satellite which uses yum. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): # rpm -q yum rpm yum-3.2.22-10.el5 rpm-126.96.36.199-9.el5 How reproducible: always with installation of Satellite Steps to Reproduce: 1. find installation tree with Satellite-5.3.0-RHEL5-re20090507.1-x86_64 2. ./install.pl # 3. Error Checksumming, bad checksum type sha256 # there smth like 700Mb of packages Actual results: I tried i386 and x86_64 with errors: . .#see attachment . --> Processing Dependency: jakarta-commons-discovery for package: axis --> Running transaction check ---> Package jakarta-commons-discovery.x86_64 1:0.3-4jpp.1 set to be updated ---> Package wsdl4j.x86_64 0:1.5.2-4jpp.1 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved Error Checksumming, bad checksum type sha256 Expected results: It can be installed Additional info: it works with yum-3.2.19-18.el5 from RHEL5U3
Comment 2 seth vidal 2009-05-13 14:20:19 EDT
Is rhel5 supporting sha256 checksums?
Comment 3 Petr Sklenar 2009-05-13 14:22:44 EDT
How could I find it?
Comment 4 seth vidal 2009-05-13 14:36:06 EDT
okay, I need some info: 1. can you provide a link to the repodata where these pkgs came from? 2. can you provide the set of pkgs installed on the system(s) where you were running this? thanks
Comment 5 James Antill 2009-05-13 15:25:19 EDT
I'm also reming the Regression keyword, until we get more info. ... as I _highly_ doubt that this is true (that it works on 5.3, that is).
Comment 6 Petr Sklenar 2009-05-13 15:28:13 EDT
Created attachment 343853 [details] installed set of packages on system
Comment 7 Petr Sklenar 2009-05-13 15:33:36 EDT
system points to rhn.webqa.redhat.com and packages are downloading from channel "rhn satellite" you can try it on rhts machine: amd-toonie2-01.rhts.bos.redhat.com folder: /mnt/hostel/local/Satellite-5.3.0-RHEL5-re20090507.1-i386 ./install.pl then see log with yum: tail -f /var/log/rhn/rhn-installation.log
Comment 8 James Antill 2009-05-13 16:16:30 EDT
Ok, I lied ... it's localinstall defaulting to sha256. This patch fixes it: diff --git a/yum/packages.py b/yum/packages.py index 3dc7a15..48cee27 100644 --- a/yum/packages.py +++ b/yum/packages.py @@ -1580,7 +1580,9 @@ class YumLocalPackage(YumHeaderPackage): def localPkg(self): return self.localpath - def _do_checksum(self, checksum_type='sha256'): + def _do_checksum(self, checksum_type=None): + if checksum_type is None: + checksum_type = misc._default_checksums if not self._checksum: self._checksum = misc.checksum(checksum_type, self.localpath) self._checksums = [(checksum_type, self._checksum, 1)]
Comment 14 Ruediger Landmann 2009-09-01 15:46:57 EDT
Release note added. If any revisions are required, please set the "requires_release_notes" flag to "?" and edit the "Release Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: When yum installed local packages, it defaulted to expecting SHA-256 checksums. Because packages for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 use MD5 checksums, the installation would fail with a bad checksum type error. Now, when yum encounters a bad SHA-256 checksum, it attempts to verify the package with a SHA-1 checksum instead, which will sucessfully verify the MD5 checksums used for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 packages.
Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2009-09-02 03:33:16 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1419.html