Bug 501486

Summary:	Please package the lobby server as well
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Bruno Wolff III <bruno>
Component:	springlobby	Assignee:	Gilboa Davara <gilboad>
Status:	ASSIGNED ---	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	bruno, gauret, sunbed
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Bruno Wolff III 2009-05-19 13:01:18 UTC

Description of problem:
As far as I can figure out, the spring packages in Fedora do not include the Spring lobby server. This is useful for running lan games.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Aurelien Bompard 2009-05-23 15:18:11 UTC

I can't find the source for the lobby server on Spring's website, any idea where I could get this ?

Comment 2 Bruno Wolff III 2009-05-23 18:30:02 UTC

I looked around a bit and found something that might be it. I am not sure if it isn't changing or if this is an old version though.
http://springrts.com/svn/spring/Lobby/TASServer/

Comment 3 Neil Williams 2010-05-09 18:52:14 UTC

Hi I'm not sure if I should open a new bug or just add to this one, so for now I have added to this one.  The recent update to SpringLobby 0.79 doesn't work.  It is a SpringLobby error not a build error. As such lobby 0.80 has recently been released to fix it.

At the moment I can't play Spring as starting the game from the lobby causes an error so the sooner this can be updated the better.

BTW If I should have created a new bug - sorry. Please just let me know and I will.

Comment 4 Aurelien Bompard 2010-05-10 05:20:39 UTC

Yeah, it would have been better to open a new bug, but it's OK now, I've built the 0.80 version. It will be pushed on the next sync.
Thanks for reporting.

Comment 5 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2010-12-14 14:03:58 UTC

This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 6 Gilboa Davara 2011-12-05 12:21:06 UTC

I'm not sure I have the time to do it right now, but never the less, which of the two servers (TASServer, UberServer) has been tested and found to be working on Fedora?

- Gilboa

Comment 7 Bruno Wolff III 2011-12-30 19:12:55 UTC

This would definitely be a low priority feature. I don't have a strong opinion here, but whichever is easiest to package or whichever would work better for people that wanted to run a private lobby.