Bug 502091
Summary: | Multiple rawhide yum repo's displayed in reposetup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | James Laska <jlaska> | ||||
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | low | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | anaconda-maint-list, dcantrell, jturner, notting, rmaximo, vanmeeuwen+fedora | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2009-05-29 20:43:29 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
James Laska
2009-05-21 20:01:08 UTC
What has enabled=1 in /etc/anaconda.repos.d/* ? Created attachment 345160 [details] installer-repos.tar (In reply to comment #1) > What has enabled=1 in /etc/anaconda.repos.d/* ? Looks like /etc/anaconda.repos.d/fedora-updates.repo [updates] and /etc/anaconda.repos.d/fedora.repo-[fedora] Does this persist with RC images? Sure does(In reply to comment #3) > Does this persist with RC images? Yes Sorry, probably should have asked for more info. Does it happen with both media and network installs? Looks like booting and installing from the RC2 x86_64 DVD (tested both i386 and x86_64) shows the correct repos: * Installation Repo * Fedora - Rawhide -Development packages for the next fedora release * Fedora 11 - x86_64 * Fedora 11 - x86_64 - Test Updates * Fedora 11 - x86_64 - Updates However when booting and installing from rawhide, I see duplicate repos. * Installation Repo * Fedora - Rawhide -Development packages for the next fedora release * Fedora development - x86_64 * Fedora development - x86_64 - Test Updates * Fedora development - x86_64 - Updates Seeing the two sets side-by-side shows that there's no difference other than the version of '11' vs 'development'. So just a minor nit with this bug more than anything else. I think this is just the difference in how rawhide is composed. CC'ing Jesse. Yes, when we compose rawhide, pungi is called with a version of development, whereas when making the release, we call it with a version of the release. Gotcha, so I guess this is more just NOTABUG. It just looked funny, but given it isn't present when doing F11 RC installs, but I don't see anything needing to be "fixed" here. |