Bug 502091

Summary: Multiple rawhide yum repo's displayed in reposetup
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: James Laska <jlaska>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: anaconda-maint-list, dcantrell, jturner, notting, rmaximo, vanmeeuwen+fedora
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-05-29 20:43:29 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
installer-repos.tar none

Description James Laska 2009-05-21 20:01:08 UTC
Description of problem:

During the reposetup install screen, I see 2 repos that seem to both reference rawhide. 

 * Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release
 * Fedora development - x86_64

The repourl's differ for the the two entries (rawhide vs develoment), but they essentially both point to rawhide righT?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 * anaconda-11.5.0.54

Steps to Reproduce:
1. PXE boot rawhide with method=
2. Proceed through installation to reposetup screen
  
Actual results:

 * http://jlaska.fedorapeople.org/Screenshot.png

Expected results:

 * I could be wrong, but the repo's listed seem different.  THe 2nd and 3rd repo's listed seem to both point to rawhide.  Is that right?


Additional info:

Comment 1 Chris Lumens 2009-05-22 17:16:06 UTC
What has enabled=1 in /etc/anaconda.repos.d/* ?

Comment 2 James Laska 2009-05-22 20:25:33 UTC
Created attachment 345160 [details]
installer-repos.tar

(In reply to comment #1)
> What has enabled=1 in /etc/anaconda.repos.d/* ?  

Looks like /etc/anaconda.repos.d/fedora-updates.repo [updates] and /etc/anaconda.repos.d/fedora.repo-[fedora]

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2009-05-29 04:03:21 UTC
Does this persist with RC images?

Comment 4 James Laska 2009-05-29 12:20:09 UTC
Sure does(In reply to comment #3)
> Does this persist with RC images?  

Yes

Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2009-05-29 14:21:46 UTC
Sorry, probably should have asked for more info. Does it happen with both media and network installs?

Comment 6 James Laska 2009-05-29 18:11:42 UTC
Looks like booting and installing from the RC2 x86_64 DVD (tested both i386 and x86_64) shows the correct repos:

* Installation Repo
* Fedora - Rawhide -Development packages for the next fedora release
* Fedora 11 - x86_64
* Fedora 11 - x86_64 - Test Updates
* Fedora 11 - x86_64 - Updates

However when booting and installing from rawhide, I see duplicate repos.

* Installation Repo
* Fedora - Rawhide -Development packages for the next fedora release
* Fedora development - x86_64
* Fedora development - x86_64 - Test Updates
* Fedora development - x86_64 - Updates

Seeing the two sets side-by-side shows that there's no difference other than the version of '11' vs 'development'.  So just a minor nit with this bug more than anything else.

Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2009-05-29 18:39:40 UTC
I think this is just the difference in how rawhide is composed. CC'ing Jesse.

Comment 8 Jesse Keating 2009-05-29 20:35:04 UTC
Yes, when we compose rawhide, pungi is called with a version of development, whereas when making the release, we call it with a version of the release.

Comment 9 James Laska 2009-05-29 20:43:29 UTC
Gotcha, so I guess this is more just NOTABUG.  It just looked funny, but given it isn't present when doing F11 RC installs, but I don't see anything needing to be "fixed" here.