Bug 502286
Summary: | Kickstart induced error | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | A.J. Werkman <aj.werkman> | ||||
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Eric Sandeen <esandeen> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dlehman, itamar, kernel-maint, notting, quintela, rmaximo, vanmeeuwen+fedora | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | i386 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | anaconda_trace_hash:6e2cd40a432856409a312f9c2f73f24865c4765fb96dc56c74455e6994ac9f0b | ||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2009-06-30 21:45:04 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
A.J. Werkman
2009-05-23 07:05:25 UTC
Created attachment 345180 [details]
Attached traceback automatically from anaconda.
How were you installing? Let me rephrase - can you attach the kickstart you were using? # Kickstart file Digifarma BV # install url --url http://<server>/fedora/development/i386/os lang en_US.UTF-8 keyboard us skipx text # Network configuration. network --device eth0 --bootproto static --ip <IP> --netmask <MASK> --gateway <GW> --nameserver <NS> --hostname host.digifarma.nl rootpw *********** firewall --disabled authconfig --enableshadow --passalgo=sha512 selinux --disabled timezone --utc Europe/Amsterdam zerombr bootloader --location=mbr --timeout=20 --append="nomodeset" clearpart --all --initlabel #part /boot --fstype ext3 --size=512 --grow --maxsize=1024 #part / --fstype ext3 --size=1024 --grow part /boot --fstype ext3 --size=512 part pv.7 --size=10 --grow --ondisk=sda volgroup VolGroup00 --pesize=32768 pv.7 logvol swap --fstype swap --name=LogVol01 --vgname=VolGroup00 --size=1000 --grow --maxsize=1984 logvol / --fstype ext3 --name=LogVol00 --vgname=VolGroup00 --size=1024 --grow #part swap --size=512 --grow --maxsize=1024 repo --name="Fedora rawhide - i386" --baseurl=http://<server>/fedora/development/i386/os %packages @base @core %post %end The underlying problem is a filesystem error: <6>sda1: rw=0, want=1311256, limit=1048576 <2>EXT3-fs error (device sda1): read_inode_bitmap: Cannot read inode bitmap - block_group = 5, inode_bitmap = 163906 <2>EXT3-fs error (device sda1) in ext3_new_inode: IO failure <6>attempt to access beyond end of device that is preventing the grub package from being installed: Installing grub-0.97-50.fc11.i586 error: unpacking of archive failed on file /boot/grub: cpio: mkdir failed - Input/output error my guess here is some kind of hardware problem. Eric ? Looks like another case of the device being smaller than the filesystem, something which anaconda was happily doing up until recently... dlehman? :) -Eric On second (parallel) thought - A.J. is this /dev/sda1 still intact so we can do some inspection of it? Thanks, -Eric device limit is: 1073741824 (262144 blocks) mkfs'd: 1069252608 (261048 blocks) tried to read: 1342726144 (327814 blocks) dunno what may have gone on in between. Looking at /dev/sda1 would help. -Eric I have this system intakt, as far as hardware is concerned. I use it as a testing machine, so the harddisks have been altered a lot since I ran into this bug. But tell me what you want to know, what you want me to test. Koos. A.J. if /dev/sda1 has been altered since the bug was filed then not so interesting, I guess. If it's the same size, and un-mkfs'd since then, then I guess as a start I'd like to see what "e2fsck -fn" says about it. -Eric This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle. Changing version to '11'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping I have blank the disk after this bug a few times, so I can't garanty this information covers the situation that led to the bug. But I tried to reproduce the situation. I see block coutn errors, but don't know if this is relevant to this bug. My "e2fsck -fn /dev/sda1" output is as follows: Warning! /dev/sda1 is mounted. Warning: skipping journal recovery because doing a read-only filesystem check. Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Free blocks count wrong (239641, counted=234257). Fix? no Free inodes count wrong (65237, counted=65235). Fix? no /boot: ********** WARNING: Filesystem still has errors ********** /boot: 43/65280 files (0.0% non-contiguous), 21407/261048 blocks Well, checking live filesystems is expected to find some inconsistencies. If you can recreate the problem from kickstart as originally reported, when things fail due to IO errors, -then- I'd like to be able to take a look at the filesystem, starting with an e2fsck -fn, as well as dumpe2fs -h output and the partition's size in /proc/partitions. But if you've since had a successful install which overwrote the problematic filesystem, then I'm afraid the state of the filesystem is no longer interesting. -Eric I'm going to close this, not sure we can get further info. If you see it again, or can reproduce at will, please re-open and we'll keep diggging. Thanks, -Eric |