|Summary:||Graph fails to release upon drag-move in v. 1.8.2|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Daniel Siderius <dwsbugzilla>|
|Component:||goffice||Assignee:||Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||11||CC:||belegdol, huzaifas, luke.hutch, notting, redhat-bugzilla, redhat|
|Fixed In Version:||0.6.6-4.fc11||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2009-10-21 10:03:57 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description Daniel Siderius 2009-05-28 16:46:40 UTC
Description of problem: In Gnumeric v. 1.8.2 (current version in fc10 repo), when a graph is moved, the graph does not release and anchor itself upon release of the mouse button. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.8.2 How reproducible: Guaranteed, every time. Incredibly annoying. Steps to Reproduce: 1. In Gnumeric 1.8.2, create a graph 2. Click and hold on graph, drag to a new position. 3. Graph will not release until a "double click" Actual results: Graph should release and anchor itself at new position upon release of mouse button. Expected results: Graph fails to anchor, requires double to release Additional info: This bug is specific to version 1.8.2, and has been corrected in version 1.8.4. It is well known in other Linux distros. See, for example, this Ubuntu bug record: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnumeric/+bug/316502 Version 1.8.4 is available in the rawhide repo, but upgrading to 1.8.4 with the fc11 rawhide repo requires many, many other updates to fc10.
Comment 1 Luke Hutchison 2009-10-20 23:31:55 UTC
Still present in Fedora 12 beta. Requires updating goffice, I believe. See also https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566652 .
Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2009-10-21 09:40:33 UTC
This is not a bug of gnumeric, but in goffice. The patches referenced in comment #1 solve this issue. I'm going to apply the patches from 0.6 branch of goffice at Fedora - this will fix the issue.
Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2009-10-21 09:53:46 UTC
I've applied all missing fixes from the goffice 0.6 branch: F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=137608 F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=137607 devel: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=137606
Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2009-10-21 10:06:19 UTC
goffice-0.6.6-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/goffice-0.6.6-4.fc10
Comment 5 Robert Scheck 2009-10-21 10:12:57 UTC
For goffice-0.6.6-4.fc12 see: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2612
Comment 6 Daniel Siderius 2009-10-23 14:40:15 UTC
When these updates be part of the YUM repositories?
Comment 7 Luke Hutchison 2009-10-23 14:54:46 UTC
I got the update for gnumeric yesterday and goffice today via the F12 rawhide channel. The F11 channel updates hadn't been pushed as of yesterday, I imagine they will trickle in.
Comment 8 Robert Scheck 2009-10-23 15:20:32 UTC
It should arrive in updates-testing in the next days.
Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 00:54:31 UTC
gnome-chemistry-utils-0.10.8-1.fc10.1, goffice-0.6.6-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2009-11-12 00:56:03 UTC
goffice-0.6.6-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.