Bug 503831

Summary:	NFR: Split jigdo in CLI and WYSIWYG package
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Jonathan Martens <jonathan>
Component:	jigdo	Assignee:	Ian Burrell <ianburrell>
Status:	CLOSED EOL	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	el5	CC:	ianburrell
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	ActualBug
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-04-06 10:37:16 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jonathan Martens 2009-06-02 22:04:47 UTC

I am using the latest jigdo released in EPEL for EL5 the moment on CentOS 5.3 at the time of writing: jigdo-0.7.3-4.el5

When I installed jigdo a lot of libX related packages were dragged into my minimal installation. Since jigdo has a functional CLI interface (jigdo-lite) and a WYSIWYG interface which is currently not fully functional).

Since I do my work mainly on the CLI (on a system as minimal as possible) I was wondering if it would be possible to split the package in a non-WYSIWYG package (containing only jigdo-lite) and a WYSIWYG package (containing graphical stuff), this would save me a lot of libX* related packages:

[root@mirror ~]# rpm -qa --last | grep 'Tue 02 Jun 2009'
which-2.16-7                                  Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:44:53 PM CEST
jigdo-0.7.3-4.el5                             Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:18 PM CEST
gtk2-2.10.4-20.el5                            Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:16 PM CEST
pango-1.14.9-5.el5.centos                     Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:15 PM CEST
libXrandr-1.1.1-3.1                           Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:14 PM CEST
libXinerama-1.0.1-2.1                         Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:14 PM CEST
libXi-1.0.1-3.1                               Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:14 PM CEST
libXft-2.1.10-1.1                             Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:14 PM CEST
libXrender-0.9.1-3.1                          Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:13 PM CEST
libXfixes-4.0.1-2.1                           Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:13 PM CEST
libXext-1.0.1-2.1                             Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:13 PM CEST
libXcursor-1.1.7-1.1                          Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:13 PM CEST
cairo-1.2.4-5.el5                             Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:13 PM CEST
libXdmcp-1.0.1-2.1                            Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:12 PM CEST
libX11-1.0.3-9.el5                            Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:12 PM CEST
gnutls-1.4.1-3.el5_2.1                        Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:11 PM CEST
curl-7.15.5-2.1.el5_3.4                       Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:11 PM CEST
cups-libs-1.3.7-8.el5_3.4                     Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:11 PM CEST
libXau-1.0.1-3.1                              Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:10 PM CEST
atk-1.12.2-1.fc6                              Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:10 PM CEST
libtiff-3.8.2-7.el5_2.2                       Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:09 PM CEST
libpng-1.2.10-7.1.el5_3.2                     Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:09 PM CEST
libjpeg-6b-37                                 Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:09 PM CEST
xorg-x11-filesystem-7.1-2.fc6                 Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:06 PM CEST
fontconfig-2.4.1-7.el5                        Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:06 PM CEST
hicolor-icon-theme-0.9-2.1                    Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:05 PM CEST
freetype-2.2.1-21.el5_3                       Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:11:04 PM CEST
[root@mirror ~]#

Comment 1 Ian Burrell 2010-01-18 00:17:08 UTC

I assume jigod-file would also go in the minimal package. What do you think it should be called?

Comment 2 Jonathan Martens 2010-01-18 09:10:54 UTC

(In reply to comment #1)
> I assume jigod-file would also go in the minimal package. 

I guess that would be nice indeed.

> What do you think it should be called?    

Why not keep the current naming convention used for the programs itself? Is there a problem with that? IMHO jigdo for the graphical UI package is OK as well as me being satisfied with the name jigdo-lite for the CLI package. Perhaps jigdo-cli could also be an option (analogue to php/php-cli).

Comment 3 Fedora End Of Life 2017-04-06 10:37:16 UTC

Fedora EPEL 5 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-03-31. Fedora EPEL 5
is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora
or Fedora EPEL, please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If
you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current
release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.